this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
663 points (100.0% liked)

News

28930 readers
4414 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It will at least open up research for cannabis drug development into FDA approved products.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It also basically will legalize Medical cannabis federally. This could lead to many other benefits. Get a medical card, it's legit with the state and the feds, then there shouldn't be any grounds for drug tests to affect your employment.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

The big thing is federal contracts.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Its 10 years too late for anyone to care I think. Democrats should have just straight up legalized under Obama, and even if they legalized now, they aren't going to be making major points off this politically. Its just jerk-off material for the commentary crowd. If it isn't going to make a difference to peoples lived experience, it isn't worth pursuing.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

You guys seem to think that the democrats had a fillabuster proof majority the entirety of obama's terms.

They had two years. In those two years, they spent their capital on getting the ACA passed.

Then the 2010 midterms happened, and the dems lost any chance of anything meaningful happening.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Two years of a filibuster proof majority for a president elected on hope and change, and the best they can do is a conservative healthcare plan, packed with giveaways for the big insurers.

That's when I lost all faith in the democratic party.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because Joseph Lieberman wouldn't allow it to pass without removing the public option and he was the lone vote they needed to overcome the filibuster

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yep there's always a rotating villain, how convenient.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (2 children)

He wasn't "a rotating villain"

He was always a villain.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The term "rotating villian" refers to those who are currently fulfilling the spoiler role in the party in order to stop any progressive legislation.

More recent rotating villains include Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Dont forget to add Fetterman to that list!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The point is it’s always one persons fault and that certainly everyone else was a good guy. The blame is planted on a single individual and not the party that failed as a whole

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

They've always got an excuse and aquarians willing to message it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

a president elected on hope and change

Here's a little middle school social studies lesson for you: there is a lot more to the government than the President.

Bernie Sanders could be sitting in the Oval Office right now and he'd still be struggling with the political realities that Biden is dealing with today. There would still be multiple wars raging, there would still be Republican obstructionism, there would still be a Republican controlled House and a tied Senate, etc. And I'm willing to bet you would be sitting here commenting on how "disappointing" he ended up being as a progressive....

If you want big, sweeping FDR-style changes, then elect a big sweeping congressional supermajority like FDR had. It's not rocket science, people like you would rather just shy away from the political reality of getting bills passed in favor of complaining online, and it's getting boring.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago

To be clear, they didn't have 2 years. They had ~70 days where they had the seats to pass legislation. That's when they passed the ACA.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

ACA, civil rights legislation, climate policy, and immigration reform. It was a pretty progressive two years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

But not progressive enough so I will help the least progressive candidate win. /s

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

And you seem to think two years is basically no time at all. Think about how much awful shit Republicans got up to under Trump. Approximately half of that got done in a two year period and that was even a historically deadlocked Congress. Democrats lost in 2010 precisely because two years is a long time and the best thing they got out of it was a shitty healthcare plan that, more than anything, ensured our current unsustainable system stays in place for at least another generation.

Democrats are obviously much better than Republicans in basically every sense of the word, but Republicans get their legislation passed when they have the chance and Democrats trip all over themselves trying to appease the idiots who will never join their coalition. They could learn a lot from Republicans about pushing their agenda but it seems pretty clear by now they aren't going to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

It's the classic problem. Democrats can't get anything done, Republicans get the wrong thing done. Been that way as long as I can remember.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yep, it's amazing what you can do if you ignore laws, lock out the opposite side, control all three branches of government, and literally pass shit with stuff penciled in on the side.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Being democratic and inclusive is pointless if it prevents progress. People want good, affordable healthcare more than they care about if it was achieved with Republicans at the table too. The Democratic process is a means to an end, it’s not sacred and should be disposed of when it can’t work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If Democrats are incapable of governing when given the power, maybe we should stop voting for them.

There is no point in empowering someone with my vote if they can't do anything with it once they've taken power.

Republicans have gotten more done in minority positions than Democrats have when in majority position over the past 20 years.

Democrats are conveniently bad at this shit when it comes to getting the things their voters want done, done. When it comes to getting shit Republicans want done, they are also conveniently powerless.

Maybe we shouldn't vote for Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Turns out, it's easier to break stuff than to create actual policy.