this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
409 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22730 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My brother in christ it takes literally one Google search to see how utter bullshit this take is.

https://www.hrc.org/resources/president-bidens-pro-lgbtq-timeline

One that struck me is how Biden handled monkeypox. Under Trump, monkeypox would have been a "gay disease" that would have not been taken seriously at all. The Biden administration took it seriously and now I've completely forgotten it was a thing.

Go take your lunch break Dimitri.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Christ is a myth, and if you think a single example in 4 years is anything impressive, it just proves how thirsty you are.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I posted an entire fucking list. The letters in blue will send you to another website with that list if you click it. It's amazing what they've done for internet formatting these days.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Don't bother, he's one of the many trolls whose entire purpose on Lemmy is to shit on biden

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

your list only goes back 2.5 years; here's a tip of the iceberg of a list that goes back MUCH longer with the first including a reference to a pro-gay politician in 1984:

biden voted against gay marriage

biden voted against gays in the military

biden affirmed his stance on anti-gay marriage in 2006

biden supported banning gays in federal service eg executive order 10450

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Man you keep missing the point of looking at the current administration.

Go take your break before Putin sends you to the gulag.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

i hope you enjoy your blue-maga kool-aid

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

thirsty is the right word; biden has spent all except the last 2.5 years as an influential anti-gay politician and hearing him called the most pro-gay president ever is heart breaking as someone who has had to live with his anti-gay policies and votes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

his pro gay "history" only goes back 2.5 years. lol

while his any-gay history goes back 40+ years

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It’s a good thing he’s not going to be running for president 40 years ago, isn’t it? Unless you’re willing to make a blanket generalization that no one can change, maybe back way from the microphone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

he literally tried to multiple times back then. lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So? Tell me how that has anything to do with now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it shows that he has no real principles and is just a politician who only cares about getting votes to maintain the status quo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You: Politicians should listen to constituents to represent them and change positions based on new information.

Also You: Anytime a politician changes their position or just a lie to get votes [which is somehow bad].

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

it speaks to the heart of biden's character; he literally singled out and made the lives of a vulnerable group of people miserable for decades because it got him votes. he didn't change; he just switched faces to get votes and blue maga is giving him a pass despite him being an instrumental figure that created the the political reality we have in this country today.

he'd still be voting against gay people too if it weren't for younger voters making that a problem for him and he's still exactly the same he was on every single other issue; ask the railroad strikers; or people crippled by student loan debt; or refugees imprisoned for fleeing from persecution; or the palestinians in gaza if you doubt that much.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Aww man, wish I caught that. Why didn't the Biden administration help the LGBT community 40 years ago!? He really wasn't a great president in 1984. /S

Look, his recent record shows the kind of administration he's running, and what we could expect in the next 4 years. You may remember he (and Obama) said he believed marriage was between a man and a woman during the 2008 debates. Then, you may remember under the same administration, Gay marriage was federally legalized. It's not like he's going to go back to his pre-2008 stance in November.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Aww man, wish I caught that. Why didn’t the Biden administration help the LGBT community 40 years ago!? He really wasn’t a great president in 1984. /S

there were plenty of pro-gay politicians in 1984 and biden's track record of actively making it worse is a 30 second google search away.

... You may remember he (and Obama) said he believed marriage was between a man and a woman during the 2008 debates. Then, you may remember under the same administration, Gay marriage was federally legalized...

gay marriage was made legal through the courts so it became legalized in spite of that administration; not because of it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

in spite of that administration

Wtf are you talking about? Do you not remember DOMA being repealed which was crucial for gay marriage to pass? Here is a quick list for you to use as evidence that the Obama administration was hostile to LGBTQ people.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/09/fact-sheet-obama-administrations-record-and-lgbt-community

plenty of pro-gay politicians in 1984

Wtactualf are you talking about? Yes there were a handful, but being gay was ESPECIALLY a political death sentence then. Saying this just erases the fraught past we've had, and doesn't recognize the INSANE amount of progress we've made.

Also if you read my comment you'd recognize that argument is moot, as his current administration is what is important.

You gotta go and audit your history YouTube channels. You're getting some wacked info.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

the obergefell v. hodges supreme court case made doma invalid. you're thinking of the respect for marriage act which not only had no impact but allowed for people to legally protected if they rejected gay marriage.

hollywood and political agitators made that progress happen; while those people you're supporting remained neutral at best and voted against it at the worst.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What does that have to do with now?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it means that he only does the things that will get him votes

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

You spelled donations wrong.