715
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

How was Biden worse than expected?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter, all parent commenter needs to do is say it, and it's true!

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

-Union strike busting

-Climate acceleration, more highways, more trucks and SUV's, banning affordable EVs

-Increased defense spending

-Higher deportations and now executive order asylum closing

-Renewed oil and gas leasing on federal lands, and weird restriction on leasing federal lands for renewable energy that more oil and gas leasing has to happen first

-The longest stretch of no minimum wage increase ever.

-rampant inflation

-lack of prosecution for a ton of crimes from Trump and other republicans

-no effort against Americas problem of gun violence

-campaigned on fixing a gap in subsidy coverage for health insurance for the lowest earning Americans, with no mention since

Not even mentioning the biggest problem people have with them, plenty of people have told you already.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Roe v. Wade was overturned under his mandate period as well. Sure it’s a Supreme Court decision, and the SC is mostly republican but it’s not like Biden couldn’t have pushed harder. He could, but then he wouldn’t be able to campaign on it.

“Vote for me and I’ll return some rights to people, maybe.”

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, it's all the Democrats' fault that six Republican appointed justices overturned Roe.

Bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is absolutely their fault there are more Republicans in the Supreme Court. Justices aren't naturally occurring by unpredictable Acts of God.

It is also RBG's fault, while we're at it.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Your RGB point is the first one of merit. Sure should have left at an advantageous time.

The judges were appointed by a majority Republican Congress with a republican president. In what way could democrats stop it?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Scalia died almost a full year before Obama left office. That was his appointment, but the Dems didn't bother putting up a fight because they were convinced Clinton would be the next president and wanted to focus on the election. Then in freaking late October 2020, days before the election, they once again allowed another Trump appointment without putting up any sort of fight or stall tactic because they didn't want to rock the boat before the election.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The majority republican congress and the republican president are also their fault. They're pretty much the only ones running against them.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In that case it's their parents faults for fucking.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not their parents fault they're incompetent corrupt pieces of shit. Or maybe it is a little bit, just not as much.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So more people should have voted Democrat, despite misgivings, to avoid a worse outcome that comes from not voting Democrat.

It's a two-party system, those are your choices.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The party should have fielded better candidates instead of constantly pushing candidates that appeal to right-wing voters who would never even vote for them to begin with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That is exactly the kind of dogshit strategy that disenfranchises voters, loses elections and gives republicans a majority.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
  1. The genocide he's not just supporting, but now actively involving US military in.

  2. Making trump border policies permanent law.

  3. Not fulfilling campaign promises

But like, please don't do that thing where because I didn't list every little thing, that I'm saying the only issues with Biden are the ones I listed.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Frankly, all of that should have been expected.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If you expected #1 and still voted for him...

I dunno, but at least now people can't act like they don't understand how people voted for hitler.

I expected this shit from republicans, but way too many people who call themselves Dems are just ok with genocide.

Apparently all it took to get Dems to support genocide, is only give them the option of more genocide?

And republicans are all about genocide, so now neither party can be counted on to be consistently against genocide?

What I still don't understand, is why so many of you are just ok with it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s the sound of the Overton window ratcheting to the right, and the democrats locking it in place

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What I don’t understand is knowing this… you still do your best to rally people to either not vote, or vote third party. Look, it’s a shit system. No one here is cheerleading for it. But because so few people chose to be activists in the off years between elections…

This is what we get when no one cares about politics when it actually matters. No. What we get are single-issue SJWs every election year shouting at everything trying to keep democrat alive while the rest of you whine about… whatever bothers you at the moment. And let’s not even mention the right-wing trolls among you that pretend to support your causes, but are only fanning the flames to prop up their boy.

And after all this… when the smoke clears in November, when the decision is made- ALL of you will disappear and reroll as victims of whatever that decision is.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I don’t understand is knowing this… you still do your best to rally people to either not vote, or vote third party

You put that on voters (of which there are millions) but nothing for the DNC or Biden? Maybe 20 people who could give voters what they want?

Why?

What we get are single-issue SJWs

Even while typing this, I know people would still do it...

But like, please don’t do that thing where because I didn’t list every little thing, that I’m saying the only issues with Biden are the ones I listed.

Single issue voters are not a really thing.

But when enough people unify under a common cause, progress can be made. Which is while everytime the common people band together, there's a couple telling them unity is bad, and they should always break apart and only worry about themselves.

MLK had some choice words about people that did that. Malcolm had more than words.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

….. okay buddy.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t understand is knowing this… you still do your best to rally people to either not vote, or vote third party.

And what I don't understand is whether this is to help War Criminal Putin or Convicted Felon and Sex Offender Treason Trump.

I guess it doesn't matter it all benefits the same Axis Powers.

The Axis of Evil

Treason Trump - War Criminal Putin - Comrade Xi - Monster King Kim Jong Un

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I didn’t list every little thing

You listed 3 false things.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

People got confused when he ran on a platform that was "nothing will fundamentally change" and thought that meant he would push all the progressive ideas they wanted /s

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And people up above are literally commenting that Biden is "the most progressive leader" we've had in several decades.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I think he'd be worse if you expected him to not support Israel do a genocide, but if you expected that you should have read up on his positions and, frankly, the last 70 years of United States foreign policy.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Expecting or not doesnt affect being bad or not

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Totally. But this is about wether he's below or above expectations. If your expectations were low then it stands to reason the bad things could match your expectations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"Worse than expected," depends largely on the individual and what they were expecting. It comes down to expecting one thing and being disappointed in the outcome.

People who expected him to be an ally of immigrants are disappointed in his border policies.
People who expected him to fix Trumps "easy" trade wars are disappointed in his trade policies.
People who expected him to support labor are disappointed in his ban of the railroad workers strike.
People who expected him to champion human rights are disappointed in his support of the IDF.

He may have met your expectations and the expectations of the majority of Democrats. Biden's 2020 victory depended on several groups who only showed up because they hoped that he would address their specific concerns.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Because he's further right than Reagan and Bush Jr.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Because he’s further right than Reagan and Bush Jr.

Those 2 both gave gigantic tax cuts to the rich. Biden raised corporate tax rates. I can remember every president since Nixon and Biden has been the most progressive in my lifetime.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No he didn't. We're still under the tax rates Trump set in 2018 that dropped corporate tax rates to 21% and increased rates for lower and middle class individuals.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax_in_the_United_States#Federal_tax_rates

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Biden raised the minimum corporate tax rate from 0% to 15% rather than simply reverse the Trump corporate tax rate reduction.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/16/watch-live-biden-to-sign-inflation-reduction-act-into-law-setting-15percent-minimum-corporate-tax-rate.html

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While the new taxes are “generally not positive for stocks,” the 15% corporate minimum tax won’t be “material,” Wells Fargo analysts wrote in an Aug. 9 research note that called the new taxes “modest.”

Just over 170 companies in the S&P 500 paid less than 15% in taxes last year, according to a new analysis by Credit Suisse. Of those corporations, less than half would likely see a tax hike for 2023 since the legislation allows companies to use adjusted earnings, which can be massaged in a number of ways, the analysis found.

So a very modest increase for roughly 80 companies. Really groundbreaking stuff here.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/16/bidens-new-corporate-tax-hike-wont-be-material-to-most-us-companies.html

In passing the bill, they also stripped out universal child care and tax cuts for the middle class. Business as usual it seems. Lots of money for energy companies and health insurance companies and nothing for the working person.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
715 points (100.0% liked)

News

31214 readers
1367 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS