this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
157 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9439 readers
1324 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

We can fix this by passing proportional representation, voting out conservatives politicians, increasing the carbon tax to $300 per ton, ending the $18.6 billion oil industry and $2 billion animal agriculture receive in subsidies from the federal government, regulating industry further.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And build high speed electrified transit to reduce transportation emissions

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

We need Via Rail to electrify as well.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I would love to see PR implemented, but it's not a panacea. It might reduce the conservatives representation in parliament but the Liberals would still be a strong party under PR. The Liberals set most of the existing climate targets and policy, and they are insufficient because the Liberals are a neoliberal party. They are fundamentally opposed to short term economic loss as a political ideology. They won't invest in the sort of measures needed to mitigate climate change.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The voters would have stronger influence in the elections as they would be able to hold the politicians more accountable as they could vote for the other choices in the future without trashing their own vote.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True, but you have to remember that a decent percentage of voters disagree with everything you said in your above comment. Just because our democracy becomes healthier, doesn't mean our lawmakers wouldn't still make dumb policy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is research that under proportional representation democracies perform better on climate action.

Source:

https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/october-2020/breaking-through-on-climate-action-and-electoral-reform/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't doubt that. All I said is that it's not a panacea. As I said, I would be very happy for PR to be a thing here. Once you make the government more proportional, you then need to actually make everyone give a shit about fixing problems. To get everyone pulling in the same direction on some of these issues is going to be an extremely uphill battle.

A significant chunk of Canadians think we are currently doing too much to mitigate climate change, that we should not endorse urbanist policies in our city planning or transportation infrastructure, and that we should reduce social programs that help people with addictions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree that education needs to be ramped up because the public lacks understanding in many key areas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, and as we've seen, when you make changes to education which are intended to push a specific political agenda, it always galvanizes opponents of that agenda to go out and vote. So we need to be very careful how that sort of thing is handled.