this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
293 points (95.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4187 readers
405 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and a sexual craving for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

I think it's the fact that furries tend to bring their kink public. I have not consented to engage in your sex games. If he showed up to a ceremony in leather and a ballgag no one would be ok with it, but the fur suit is the equivalent and I'm expected to applaud.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

The fursuit is the equivalent??? I'm actually laughing rn people think this???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You sound like the kind of person that wants to ban drag story time at the libraries because "kids shouldn't be exposed to someone's kink"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So the distinction I feel here is that women are people. If a man wants to dress like a woman, sure, most people can interact with women in public, whatever. If you want to call them both, broadly, a form of cosplay, then drag is a costume that doesn't fundamentally change much. Animals aren't people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

A big part of this misconception is actually from That Episode. You can actually google the phrase That Episode. No need to even specify the show, just those two words are enough (but the show is CSI). There's a bunch to read into if you'd like, but the important bit is that a big part of public opinion - which has only recently begun to change, and only in some parts of the internet - comes from That Episode's portrayal of furries

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

bring their kink into public

But it's not a kink for them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

I mean, no. It's really not.

I do get what you're saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Some do, many don't. A fursuit is a costume, as a cosplayer in fandoms do, and I guarantee there are cosplayers that have sex in their costumes.

Knowing quite a few fursuiters there's less of them that want to have sex in suit because it's hot as fuck, makes you a lot more clumsy, and those suits are expensive as hell as they're custom made.