this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
341 points (100.0% liked)

News

27975 readers
3978 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 134 points 3 months ago (3 children)

If he shows up at my door, I'll gladly house him. You should too.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Aiding and abetting murder can result in the same charges and penalties as the principal offender, which could include life in prison without parole

[–] [email protected] 102 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Your statement could be true, but the way you’re presenting it sounds like you’re just letting the oppressors win.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Getting locked up by an oppressor. Whoever heard of that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Got a loaded shotgun waiting for any pig that thinks I'm going in quietly for doing the right thing

We all should

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're dumb enough to go into jail when fascism is in charge that's on you

Its called having a plan and knowing what your government thinks of people like you

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing about big talkers. They always talk big.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing about bitches, they assume everyone else doesn't have the basic strength of will to follow their convictions

Sad that you'd let fascists take you in. Pathetic, really

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sad that keyboard warriors usually have to face their truth eventually. They're so entertaining

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

keyboard warriors

If you find "I keep a loaded shotgun at my door and am not afraid to kill fascists rather than be taken by them" to be keyboard warrior talk then damn, son, you must live a pathetic fucking life

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Don't listen to this dumbass. I've got a loaded shotgun at the door too. And a little hatchet in case things aren't as deadly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

See? Getting personal is always the last resort.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Last resort of...?

Like I said: pathetic

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This isn't true. Harboring someone from the police after they commit a crime makes you an accessory, not a primary.

Edit: to be more concrete and actually cite what I'm saying (my bad), we'll use federal law since they clearly crossed state lines multiple times in the stages of committing this ~~act of heroism~~ crime:

An accessory after-the-fact is someone who, knowing a crime was committed, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the offender or in any manner aids them to escape arrest or punishment. See: U.S. v. Triplett, 92 F.2d 1174 (5th Cir. 1991). The aid provided by the defendant to the principal must be given after the principal completes the crime.

The basic elements the government must demonstrate to prove that a defendant was an accessory after-the-fact are: (1) the commission of an underlying crime against the United States; (2) the defendant’s knowledge of that offense; and (3) assistance by the defendant in order to prevent the apprehension, trial, or punishment of the offender. See: U.S. v. White, 135 S. Ct. 1573, 191 L. Ed. 2d 656 (2015); Ellis v. U.S., 806 F. Supp. 2d 538 (E.D. N.Y. 2011).

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

If enough people are accessories, no one is an accessory

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry I don't watch the news, so I have no idea who this person on my couch is, he just looked like a good guy who does good things.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't let them find your Lemmy account.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

What is this "Lemmy" you speak of? Never heard of it...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

No it doesn't. If it did, the comment would say "Shark does not care".

Wink.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

it hurts you that people support this guy hehe

good

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Doesn't hurt me. I don't support murderers

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

your tone says other wise, my neo lib acolyte

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then you must be in quite a conundrum with who was killed here; if you want justice for the CEO by finding the killer of the CEO, you're supporting a murderer; if you support the killer of the CEO, you're supporting a killer.

Tough moral quandary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes, all the death can be laid at the feet of one guy. What a simplistic place to live.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Said the guy that "doesn't support a murderer" no matter what.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Nah, you don't get to claim "I didn't mean it it was a joke" when people disagree with your opinion

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It takes a lot of people to make a missile, yet it only takes one to declare war. Who's more at fault? If I steal a thousand elderly people's retirement savings, and someone else steals my car, are we equally thieves? What if the son of a person who I stole from took it, does that change anything?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Of course. So let's shoot him in the back.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, that would be bad. But if that retirement stealer continues to steal, and the law doesn't do anything, and the whole system is made so he will never get any consequences, there could be a moment when shooting him in the back is the only moral decision

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, that would be bad.

And exactly what happened

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I like how in your quest for moral absolutism you came full circle and found the basis for absolute immortality.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Me to the judge: He said he was my cousin Paddy!

Me to the shooter: You lied to me! *wangs him with a skillet*

problem solved.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

And you don’t have to ask him why he is running. It’s perfectly legal to help a stranger in need without asking them if they broke the law. In fact, it used to be seen as the most Christian thing to do by not judging.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I said exactly this to my friend on the phone today.