this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9422 readers
662 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can someone please say what it is so I don’t have to watch this video?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)

New bike lanes need special approval if they are going to disrupt cars in any way

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Specifically, new city bike lanes will require provincial approval.

Even after the city has approves them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why's that dumb? Because it ultimately forces bikes to share widened footpaths like in Europe and we're better than that?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago

Luckily I know just the video that explains it

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

The footpaths are not being widened, in some cases the foot paths are only two shoulder widths wide.

Doug Ford made a claim about actually wanting to shrink some footpaths along university to allow for more cars, whole also removing dedicated bike lanes.

Most people in Canada don't see bike lanes as something that increases pedestrian safety as a whole. Which is a shame all around.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

It is dumb because they are also ripping up existing bike lanes that have not impacted traffic and has benefitted the local economy. This is also just a blanket law so nearly every road in the province is subject to it.

It is dumb because a provincial government is over reaching into politics on a very local level that typically impacts local neighbourhoods, this kind of decision making should be up to the councilors, the people the local population elected to make these decisions.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Because (a) it will be used as an excuse to blanket-deny every bike lane, no matter how little disruption it might cause in reality, and more importantly (b) bike lanes should disrupt cars and are still good!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

"Widened footpaths"? You mean you want to take space away from cars for pedestrians now? Hah!