this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
312 points (100.0% liked)

News

28531 readers
4363 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 115 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'Struggle with generosity' is to greed, like 'died as a result of an officer involved shooting' is to murder.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I would say there's a distinction.

"I want more" is different from "I don't want to share".

[–] geogle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The American heritage dictionary definition 1: ^ An excessive desire to acquire or possess more than what one needs or deserves, especially with respect to material wealth.

Seems that both fall squarely within the definition of greed.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the other commenter's point is that "struggling with generosity" is just another way to say "greed", then I think that's overly reductionist

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Is it? Why? That doesn't seem self evident to me at all.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could be unwilling to share what you have while also not desiring more of what you have. They are just two different concepts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Friend making $450k as a software engineer

I’m a software developer. If I just start calling myself an engineer, can I have 450k?

[–] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just change your email signature and you're good to go :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you a senior or staff software engineer for a multinational tech company in the Bay Area or NYC?

$450k is typical in that case.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Seniors are usually pulling around $200k in NYC, plus stock worth around $100k. Still crazy high, but not nearly $450k unless they've been there for a very long time, and the high CoL makes it worth about half of that.

Staff engineers, as in those who write 4 lines of code a year, are closer to $450k

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Staff engineers get paid the big bucks to spend all day in meetings so the rest of us don't have to.

Worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Nope, has more to do with which company you work at

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was a program many years back that discussed this issue. It showed two kids, young girls, one was fairly well off and had all the things you’d expect a young girl to have and some to spare. The other was a young girl living in an impoverished nation and had a very poor family. Think tin roof on adobe walls kind of poor. She had a single stuffed animal that was in dubious shape handed down from child to child. The well-off girl had a small army of stuffed animals.

Point of the segment in the program was how difficult it was for the well off girl to share anything and how possessive she was for her material things, whereas the little girl that had very few things was willing to share her one stuffed animal quite willingly.

Wish I could remember the show. But it demonstrated quite handily that even at a young age people who had more, wanted more, and were unwilling to part with even small things vs the people who had very little.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had to read a bit to understand what this meant because I didn't know what venmo was, but I have seen people change from being weirdly generous to making more money and fairly quickly becoming irritatingly stingy to the point of nitpicking the rounding when pennies were discontinued.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I didn't know what it was either. If someone wanted me to send them money remotely, I'd probably use Google Pay or PayPal or something. Hooray for being out of touch with the world today!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

One of the many reasons that I don't have venmo or any other form of transfer app is so people can't send me some nominal sum of money.

I'm not rich, but definitely one of the higher earners at my job. I don't want some person making less than half what I do worrying about a slice of pizza or a cup of coffee.

To note: This is also not something I gloat over or continuously remind people of or any such thing. I'm just happy to have the resources to be able to bring the smallest smidgen of "make your day a little less shitty"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is amazing how rich people deal with non-rich people. I managed to climb from poor to reasonable well off, but I cannot understand people who earn many times the money I get to be assholes over small money.

Last week, I took a student that I want to "groom" to work in our development department to an electronics fair. Train, hotel, and ticket were paid for by the company, but the deal was that he has to pay for anything else by himself. Eating out and other expenses are still quite some money for a student, so I paid for his meals out of my own pocket and told him that one time in the future, when he will be the one guiding a student through the same situation, he should do as I did.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I understand what you mean with groom, but poor choice of words. 😂

Mentor/onboard/fast track, or any other would have sounded better. Groom just sounded like you wanted to fuck him.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Thanks. Call me old, I come from a time where "to groom" had no sexual connotation.

[–] atkion@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I disagree honestly, the context made it very clear what was meant here, and was a proper use of the word imo.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The word has been used that way for a long time though.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And molest has been used to mean bother for some time. But I think most people shy away from using it that way now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sir_Fridge@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or they're Dutch. Seriously we'll send you a venmo (tikkie) for 3 cents.

Austin Powers warned us

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm glad that's never happened to me. They wouldn't be my friend anymore.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article talks about how this is not them being assholes, but because if they have more money then their peers, it tends to make them feel isolated and self-conscious and fears about being taken advantage of. They even quote the expert at the end who says "They don’t care about the $4."

You would ditch a friend for struggling with someone? I find that hard to believe.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If they don't care about my money, they shouldn't ask for it. It's just shitty behavior.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True, but people do things they shouldn't do all the time because they are struggling. Like if your depressed friend flakes on hanging out, that's "shitty behavior" too. Are they are bad person who you should ditch? Or a friend suffering that needs your support? In both cases, it seems to be the latter.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (40 children)

If they need my support, they can ask for my support. They're asking for money.

If you can't open up to me enough to say "I need your help," I don't think we were very good friends in the first place.

load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People don't usually get rich by giving money away or being bad at finances. Why is a wealthy person obliged to not ask you to pay back your share?

I'm by no means rich but I'm probably the wealthies of all my friends yet I live in a tiny house, drive a 15 year old truck and shop groceries at a discount. I'm extremely frugal and you can be sure I expect you to pay me back.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I was finding this article funny because when I was flat broke, you bet your ass I was keeping track of $5 for a cab ride.

Also, shit like that might be $5 split for one person, but if you’re the one who paid it could’ve been split four ways. Seems like nothing to the requestee, but the requester is in for $20.

Now make it drinks. Five people order drinks for $8 bucks a pop. That’s $40, plus tax and tip you’re up to $55. One person pays. Split 5 ways it’s only $11, but for the payer that’s a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Are you, like in the article, afraid of your relationships becoming transactional? Do you think that if you paid for stuff for your friends every once in a while, they would start expecting it of you, and think of you only as a means of getting this free perk?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I'm working poor and always have been. I never mind buying other people drinks or paying for their fares or whatnot, even if they make more money than I do. My philosophy is that I don't make nearly enough money to ever become rich or even well off, so what would it matter that I turn every cent around fifteen times or not? If at the end of the day I'm happy, and at the end of the month I'm not starving, then I'm living.

I'm suffering from enough shit already (chronic depression, adhd, etc) that complicating my life extra by tracking every red cent in order to deny myself and my family the last few pleasures making life worth living is not an option.

Of course, with this kind of attitude it's unlikely I'll ever become rich, even if I find a high-income job, since I care little about "making it grow". For all I know WW3 could break out tomorrow rendering EUR & USD near worthless. Then what does it matter how much you saved up?

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As someone whose situation in life has flipped (not ever really that rich, just had family that was worse off) and has suffered it, I can confirm that:

“They don’t want to be taken advantage of or to feel like, ‘I have money and that’s why people hang out with me,’” Bradley says. “It feels very invalidating.”

Because it is true. The more money you have in a situation attracts the sort of people who just want the benefits of it, and if you are generous like my parents were, those sort of people will be the ones who will have no problem becoming stingy and refuse to help them out afterwards without a dollar sign. They've been trained to live off of you and they will still continue to expect to do so even as so far as to believe you are lying while they become the stingiest.

What this article gets wrong is that it isn't because they value money transactions more, it's that they attract the sort of people who only value them for it. Plus, it also skews your own development as a person because if they come the norm in your surrounding, it fosters an environment of making you a mark.

They do not have the same life experience as you, and you may very well be part of the problem is paying your fair share when you are with someone you consider wealthy (even when they tell you they are no longer doing that good or simply seems more bothered by it) offends you.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This isn't any sort of real explanation of anything. It's just someone's opinion. They call her an "expert". She's a certified financial planner with no formal schooling or training. She passed a test and runs a company where she advises people who have suddenly come into a lot of money. That's her only expertise. She has no background in psychology or any information beyond "it rings true" to back up her statements.

[–] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Grew up in a resort town known for its plethora of rich people.

Rich people are near universally the cheapest group of people I’ve ever encountered.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It kind of makes sense, though. I grew up a povvo bitch, so if someone wanted to borrow money there were basically two outcomes

A) We simply didn't have the money to lend them
B) We had the money and might as well help them out because we like the person and they'd do the same in turn; at the end of the day we'd still struggle, so a bit less doesn't make a massive difference

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the answer is simply "people who have more money pay more attention to their finances in general". I mean, people who don't pay attention to how they're spending money tend to not stay rich, even when they have a high paying job. But then again, is there any actual evidence that the premise is true? Or is it just a bias that people take more notice when a rich friend asks to pay them back?

load more comments