Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
The reality of working with trans people will mean you slip up and use the wrong pronouns sometimes. These laws are going to add fear to speaking to trans people let alone hiring them. And what if they're abused?
I like the intent but I think these will be counter-productive to helping the trans community.
Yeah, nah mate.
That frankly sounds like concern trolling. You’re worried these laws with harm trans people yet they’ve got states outright making laws to harm trans people such as refusing to use their name, or letting them use the right toilet. Doing things that make it less likely for them to get a job, seek help in an emergency, etc.
These laws will do far more good than the small risk of one or two trans people ever abusing them.
The reality of working with black people will mean you slip up and use some casual racism sometimes. These laws are going to add fear to speaking to coloreds let alone hiring them. And what if they're abused?
The reality of working with women will mean you slip up and and get handsy with them sometimes. These laws are going to add fear to speaking to respectable women let alone hiring them. And what if I'm just talking with the guys?
I didn't always know that the turban wearing guy at the office wasn't a Muslim but was actually a Sikh. But I didn't need to be told twice, and if I did it was never with malice.
Well no because some people early in their transition cycle might have their gender confused by someone who doesn't know, whereas no one can accidentally go "oh shit sorry I didn't know you were black?".
As long as the person is polite and apologetic without being patronising I think it's okay.
How do you know someone’s skin color during a telephone call?
Fair point
We're smart enough to know when someone slips up on accident and when someone is being an asshole. We're not idiots.
Yeah I mean you're still people with emotional processes who understand social queues. Not like you're robots who can't process these things.
The key word in the guidance is "persistently" misgendering. So if someone gets the pronouns right 95% of the time, that's hardly "persistent". These guidelines target employers/people who willfully and purposefully mis gender/discriminate. If you're trying to claim these rules make you afraid to talk to trans people, you might want to take a long hard look at your own biases/phobias.
Even if someone only gets it right 50% of the time, it probably wouldn't be an issue. Like you said, it's only for those cases where someone is doing it wrong on purpose.
Or saying the correct pronoun in a patronising way.
There is a pretty obvious difference between accidentally misgendering and maliciously misgendering.
I can see the concern, as a trans and nonbinary person, about the phrasing of the headline. Casual readers will totally think the actual guidance says “if you fuck up a person’s pronouns, you go to jail” or whatever.
But not the guidance itself. We need more protections against intentional, malicious misgendering as verbal harassment. Which is usually less “she said— oops, they said—“ and more stuff like “(female coworker) put has pronouns in her signature? I thought she was a REAL WOMAN”
(The second being a real example from a friends work place. Funny thing is, friend is stealth trans and the coworker being misgendered is cis, but i digress)
But yeah all that aside I think the real context is misgendering when someone needs the bathroom, e.g. “you’re in the wrong bathroom” type comments. Where we really need stronger protections.
Ya I totally hated that one time I got fired from my CEO job because Google autocorrected she to he one time. 😂
Is it really that fucking hard to remember a pronoun? Especially when someone devoted time and energy and specifically asked to be referred to a specific way? Sounds like a you problem.
these laws are going to make certain social media users obsess about what could go wrong with these rules despite the fact such rules often aren't well enforced to begin with. Just gonna say, often you have to be really going out of your way being an asshole to get hit by this kind of stuff.
.
Just what we need: MORE federal laws, when we currently have too many to even count
It's not actually a new law, it's a clarification of a law that already exists. The supreme court ruled in 2020 that it's illegal to harass employees on the basis of sexuality or gender identity. The EEOC just issued a clarification that misgendering and bathroom bans count as harassment.
Why would you need to count them? It's not like the number is any reason not to make more. How stupid would that be? Let's say we didn't have a law against murder. I guess we've got too many, right? It's too late now. I guess it stays legal.