this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
-5 points (46.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60108 readers
355 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the world of file sharing, BitTorrent has long been hailed as the go-to protocol for its efficient initial distribution capabilities. However, when it comes to maintaining availability and ensuring the longevity of shared files, BitTorrent falls short. There are several alternative platforms that make it much easier to share files, allowing the seeder to reorganize the files to their hearts' content without losing the ability to keep seeding to a torrent. Fopnu, eMule, DC++, and Nicotine+ are some of the better alternatives that make sharing a breeze.

Related:

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SIGSEGV@waveform.social 58 points 2 years ago

Wow, what a cunt.

[–] webghost0101@lemmy.fmhy.ml 16 points 2 years ago

So who maintains these alternatives? A centralized server?

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

Private trackers usually have very healthy torrents :)

[–] br0da@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m assuming you’ve never been a member of a private tracker then? They would boot you off in a heartbeat. And after this post, no one is going to want to send you an invite.

[–] InternetPirate@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I seed 160 TB, but not over BitTorrent. I certainly don't need access to private trackers to find what I want, and I have even less interest in contributing to them since I think they are elitist. Information shouldn't be hidden behind an invitation. That's no better than a subscription or paywall in my book.

[–] mike901@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I agree information shouldn't be behind an invitation, but it does solve 3 important things:

  • Keeps the law out of your hair
  • Seed requirements ensure torrents stay alive
  • Incentivizes strict quality control and uploading new content

I can't tell you the number of times I've downloaded something from a public source and it's been crap quality, or isn't even the thing I wanted to download. Sometimes the file is fine but it takes 3 weeks to download because it has one seeder with a 10kbps upload rate. That's a big "if" on if I can find it at all if it's something more obscure.

Until someone solves those 3 issues in another way, I don't see a better solution.

[–] supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

out of curiosity, which network do you use to seed?

[–] InternetPirate@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] jo1gi@lemmy.fmhy.ml 10 points 2 years ago

You can just use hardlinks

[–] TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What’s the best current eMule client? Can cosign dc++ and Soulseek/nicotine those are my main sources these days rarely torrent

[–] supervent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

I use mldonkey 3.1.7 for ed2k/kad and bittorrent, in the past I have used dc++ for a short time, but I prefer the idea of ed2k/kad.

[–] xoggy@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While I find it annoying that I can't rename files and think that could have easily been avoided in the original bittorrent design, it's not too inconvenient to just copy the files and leave the originals in a "seed" folder.

[–] EveryoneLovesSausage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can rename through the client but it would be nice if the clients could also use a hash, then when it detects a file is missing it could just scan the dir for a matching file automatically.

[–] master@lem.serkozh.me 1 points 2 years ago

BitTorrent v1 does not hash the files, it hashes chunks (pieces), and they can span multiple files

[–] InternetPirate@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I seed 160 TB. What you are suggesting is only feasible if you share a small number of files.

[–] Nomecks@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know that Bittorrent was invented to replace these, right?

[–] TornadoValley@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Soulseek eMule and I think dc++ are younger than the BitTorrent protocol although not by much

load more comments