this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
230 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45523 readers
2450 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 112 points 9 months ago (1 children)

undermining regional carmakers

I think the word they're looking for is in fact "outcompeting."

Yutaro-Katori-with-butterfly-meme: Is this capitalism?

[–] [email protected] 92 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Outcompeting by having a nation subsidize the cost. Until local manufacturers go out of business because they can't compete. Then China owns the entire industry she jacks to the price.

It's like no one has been paying attention.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's weird that this has to be explained to Americans - this is how much of Big Tech got to where they are, except they call it "disruption".

BTW this shows perfectly that free markets are not a be-all-end-all thing. It's a tool, and if it produces outcomes that you don't like, you can adjust it for better outcomes. The hypocrisy here is not that they pretend to worship the market then cry foul when China enters it on their terms, but that they do adjust it for their benefit all the time, and only pretend to worship it when people ask for their fair share.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

While we've seen this cycle play out quite a few times in Big Tech, I think a lot of people just aren't aware of what it is. I've had friends decry how, "Uber is now basically as expensive as a taxi." I point out how Uber is only recently profitable and see people's minds get blown.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Ah, I see. So it's cool when we do it (fossil fuel and ag subsidies, the auto industry bailout in 2008, etc.) but not when they do it.

Got it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You're introducing an argument as a way to undermine the viewpoint that's opposite to yours.

No one said it's fine "when we do it". That's not the point being discussed.

The other bigger issue here is that these new cars are coming from a region that has a horrendous track record for safety and quality. EVs when done right are still a considerable risk with battery fires, but the ones manufactured in China are much worse for quality and safety. In the next few years, as these cars flood markets around the world, it will be a massive issue.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They seem safe enough to pass the EU’s safety standards, which are much higher than the US. Also this blanket “quality issues” argument without specific evidence is terrible. If we’re going off of quality in recent history, American manufacturing is down the toilet in terms of quality - just look at Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

People wrongly assume all Chinese manufacturing is aliexpress fodder.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Lmao this is coming from the same safety organization that approved the Tesla Cybertruck?

I'll take my chances with a car that's seen EU approval.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

But but but, rampant capitalism good

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean the US is also doing that. It's not a subsidies issue; it's the fact that Chinese companies are using subsidies to actually make things while US companies are just pocketing them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Is the US? What us car company is doing it to such a degree name countries are blocking their goods?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Local manufacturers

You mean Ford, GM, and Chrysler who make useless pieces of garbage and also outsource production to Mexico?

Who also got bailed out by the federal government for going bankrupt back in 2009?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

GM, who just announced a $6 billion stock buy back once they knew tariffs would keep them safe from having to compete with Chinese EVs, that GM?

This sort of stuff is realistically why I have no sympathy for the major US automotive manufacturers. The only reason I don't just say "Screw them, let Chinese EVs drive them out of business," is because it would put so many people out of work in their plants who have no role in these decisions. Barring some fantasy where the Chinese companies establish US plants and offer equivalent or better union contracts for current employees at GM, Ford and Chrysler, these companies should simply be bound hand and foot in terms and conditions whenever something is done by the government to help them. Like, make those protectionist tariffs conditional on them hitting investment targets in relevant technologies, raising worker pay and benefits, reducing cost to the customer and a ban on stock buybacks for the duration of the tariffs being valid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Lmao there's a guy who usually posts a long response to these "subsidies" claims bullshit, but I think they got into a pissing match with a mod in the comments and got banned lmao.

Jist of it is: China's subsidies are negligible compared to the US, and what they've actually done is created a competitive domestic market with a large number of players. Unless you think Chinese people are all puppets, even if China (as a country) owns the industry it would not prevent internal competition that drives down prices. Moreover, China does not offer per-unit subsidies on export. In fact, Chinese EVs exported to Europe are something like 40% more expensive than domestically for the same model.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tesla has been subsidized by years. The difference is china delivers and in America an asshole get rich.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (8 children)

That doesn't exist anywhere...and I frankly don't think it ever will.

EDIT What's with the downvotes? Does anyone want to refute this?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Logically the refutation is kind of easy. Your prediction hinges on two things. A predicate that technology will never get better or cheaper.

Both of those things happen all the time as such, the refutation is simple.

Points to our entire technological history

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

And what's the range on that? Spoiler: It's 190 mi base with a max 252 mi. That's nowhere near 350mi!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Okay thanks. That meme sure is inaccurate isn’t it. I’ll go have a word with the meme council and try to get that straightened out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (6 children)

BYD and CATL have announced that battery prices will be halved again by next year.

They're really ramping up and it will continue.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You provide no proof of the facts you state, therefore it’s just as easy for me to say you’re wrong as it is to believe you. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

How am I supposed to prove that a $15K 350mi EV doesn't exist? It's Russell's teapot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Translation: US automakers are worried about Chinese imports servicing a sector they have abandoned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

then start investing in tech, jobs, and education so the us can compete with inexpensive cars....

*editors note; i'm not a tankie, i just know that china has invested in technology while the us has been bogged down in partisanship (look at solar)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

*editors note; i’m not a tankie, i just know that china has ~~invested in~~ subsidized technology while the us has been bogged down in partisanship (look at solar)

FTFY. While the Chinese government has made major investments in technology, the problem is their excessive subsidies which are allowing Chinese manufacturers to artificially out-compete their competitors. As others have pointed out, it's the same as "Big-Tech Disruptors" who begin with unsustainable prices, and once all their competitors leave the market they raise their prices.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are Chinese subsidies really excessive compared to American subsidies? Tesla owes its entire existence to the government giving it carbon tax credits among other subsidies. Every single qualifying electric vehicle has been getting thousands of dollars in the form of tax credits all the way up to $7500 and it's only been more generous now since it can be used as a rebate right at the dealership. American car companies have taken that to mean they can jack up prices by those thousands of dollars and even more, because they still treat EVs as mainly premium products.

If you want to talk about artificially out-competing competitors, the 100% tariff is a prime example. The US has dragged its feet on technologies like EVs so they can juice profits and now it's crying and shrieking about competition being "unfair" for providing customers with a desirable product in a desirable price range. This protectionist policy not only sets back the fight against climate change, but also tightens the screws on customers who are already feeling the weight of inflation, just to continue the record profits by the auto companies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Sorta like how the US runs the petroleum markets? You should go look at how they deal with softwood lumber too. Multiple WTO complaints for unfair trade practices. The US chose where they want to pour their subsidies and so has China.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're not excessive subsidies. It's USA and Europe that are not subsidising EVs enough.

Any country or car maker that does not get on board with decarbonisation of the transport sector needs to be shut down asap.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

is it hard to.. ya know... hypothetically obtain one of these cheaper, mexican imported evs? askin for a huh friend

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (7 children)

No, you cant import it. They dont meet safety standards.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

hey shut up we're in a china bad brigade

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Car manufacturers will meet local safety standards, so a BYD sold in the EU is probably going to be safer than a BYD sold in Mexico

Here's an example with Peugeot

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (9 children)

However, you can import many kei cars and trucks and people are doing it because they're super cheap.

https://www.eezyimport.com/importing-the-essence-of-japan-a-guide-to-bringing-kei-trucks-and-cars-to-the-usa/

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you want yourself or your house to burn in a lítium battery fire, then sure, go for it.

Edit: I'm going to tag this post of mine and come back in a few years when all the stories about banning Chinese-made EVs come out because of safety issues. See you all in a couple years.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

China bad, what other source do you need?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›