this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
299 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

33318 readers
361 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 142 points 8 months ago (4 children)

And keep in mind, the falcon sensor exists for Linux. All those big companies largely use it.

Essentially we just got lucky that their buggy patch only affected the windows version of the sensor in a showstopping way. Could have been all major OS.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 42 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

I don't think the Linux culture is very similar to the windows culture. At least for me personally, I wouldn't use crowdstrike and let them install whatever they want into my environment.

Maybe it's just me.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 82 points 8 months ago

It's not your machine, your choice of distro, or your choice of specific packages to use or not use. It's a work tool you get handed as part of a job. So whether CrowdStrike runs on it or not is not your decision and you aren't allowed (and usually not capable) to change that.

That's an entirely different situation from one where you get a PC to do with as you please and set up yourself, or a private machine.

Plus we're mostly talking endpoint devices for non-technical users with many of these difficult-to-fix devices as techs have to drive out to them. The users expect a tool, and they get a tool. A Linux would be customized and utterly locked down, and part of that would be the endpoint protection software.

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We tried to fight against having to install Crowstrike on our Linux servers but got overruled by upper management without discussion. I assume we are not the only ones with that experience in the world due to the need to check a checkbox for some flimsy audit.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're actually confirming their point about culture though. The fact that you couldn't stop them doesn't mean that it also happened to everybody else: some management may have listened. Linux users abhor adding weird shit to their OS, Windows users do it all the time.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I bet you could bring it up with them now…

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Essentially no one has crowdstrike on their personal machines. Not Windows users, Mac users, or Linux users. So it's corporate/large organization culture that matters. And they absolutely use it.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you an admin in a corporate data center? If not, you're not in the target audience for that product.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Yup. And I think that says more about the corporate culture than the company that caters to them.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Welcome to the world of big retailers! They would rather run Linux with crowdstrike than make their own system.

[–] ludrol@bookwormstory.social 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

That's only true if you run falcon-sensor in ebpf and not kmod mode.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The issuw didn't affect Linux and macOS systems with Crowdstrike Falcon installed, though, only Windows systems.

On Windows, booting into Safe Mode and removing C:\Windows\System32\Drivers het bestand C-00000291*.sys temporarily solves the BSOD issue, as well.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The point is that it could have. Or maybe some unknown 0-day gets used by someone out to cause chaos instead of collect random.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's true

On one hand I hope people are smart enough to run updates to critical systems on a test environment, first. On the other hand I've learned that that is not at all the case yesterday.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Many security products have no test option. One I’m using has a best practice of a 15 minute delay between test and prod and no automation to suspend besides relying on the vendor to pull the update it within 15 mins if it were to go full crowdstrike.

[–] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 10 points 8 months ago

The problem her was that this wasn't a traditional update. It was delivered automatically as a "content" update (like how old av would have definition update). We were given no room to test.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 72 points 8 months ago

Then the internet would blame it all on Linux.

However, the recovery process would be much faster. The Linux kernel would try to load the kernel module and if it fails it would skip it.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Don't forget that ftp.cdrom.com , the biggest server on the Internet at it's peak, was running on FreeBSD.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea what the hell that is...

But Netflix runs on some BSD too

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's where you would download your anime and Quake 2 installer twenty years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 8 months ago

Freebsd, as does whatsapp and PlayStation

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

There's a free blue screen of death? All of these people paying for Windows for no reason /s

[–] suzune@ani.social 22 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Probably not. Most Linux admins know their systems and are able to navigate out of the situation with ease. But also most people don't use any corporate off-the-shelf software, because there are better options that are freely available.

Furthermore a Linux installation is dedicated and slim for one single purpose. The flexibility creates diversity.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think the shower thought is centered around IF a ubiquitous bug that required physical access to the machine to resolve occurred simultaneously across all Linux machines.

If you couldn't remotely resolve the issues, regardless of your competence, simply the WALK to each machine and hooking up a KVM to each one would take a long time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This combination of arrogance and complacency sort of thinking is how it does happen on Linux one day.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

Linux also isn't as popular on the desktop or end user devices

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 8 months ago
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Doubtful. By far, most servers responsible for Internet traffic are not running crowdstrike software.

This incident was a bunch of fortune 500 companies caught with their pants down.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Who do you think runs those servers? What do you think those companies run on their Linux servers?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Those companies aren't "the Internet." They're products connected to the Internet.

The OP argument is like saying the Internet is dead because Netflix is down.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

A lot of people would say the internet was down if a large number of those products weren’t available. Also companies like Google do own parts of the physical Internet infrastructure.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

If all of the parts of the internet that the average person finds useful goes down, then it matters little that technically "the internet" is not down. If it can't be useful then it is as good as "down".

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

2038 is the next big thing to hit older *nix based OS. It will be Y2K all over again.

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe on my 32-bit ARM server with ancient kernel it will. Any 64-bit machine is immune.

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

...unless it's running software that uses signed 32-bit timestamps, or stores data using that format.

The point about the "millennium bug" was that it was a category of problems that required (hundreds of) thousands of fixes. It didn't matter if your OS was immune, because the OS isn't where the value is.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

...timestamp is signed? Why?

Edit: Oh damn, I never noticed that the timestamp is indeed signed. For anyone curious, it is mostly historical as early C didn't really have a concept of unsigned

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago

It also allows users to store dates back to ~1902.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It'll be 911,000? As long as it's stored with 32 bits that should be fine 🤷

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I agree. We've been able to do 6 digit math for decades now

load more comments