this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

59878 readers
256 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In this chapter of "Capitalism ruins everything"

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

For comparison, NBC in the US paid US$7.75 billion (A$11.8 billion) in 2014 for the rights to broadcast the Olympics until 2032.

At that much money, you can pretty much count on extreme amounts of corruption and thievery going on behind the scenes.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

B-but capitalism breeds innovation!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

They are very creative in finding new ways to screw us over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

The thing that sucks about capitalism is that for as awful as it is, the idea that it breeds innovation is also true.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago

The IOC sucks arse.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

lol they tried to sue a company for saying a city name.

What a joke.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

F the Olympics

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Exclusivity is a failure mode for copyright. Mandatory licensing should've been the immediate goal as soon as Netflix started losing content. Blatantly awful for consumers - and we're talking about giving companies money. If you sell a thing and find yourself going 'well I don't want to sell it that way' then it's probably because you have anti-competitive schemes in mind. We can't tolerate that shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

This is the reason? I was wondering why everybody's talking about it but not showing it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Any large multi-national international competition with a significant public interest should have and require public access.