this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
124 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22730 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's an AIPAC stooge. Fuck him.

[–] imposedsensation 18 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It would be hilarious if Democrats lost the election because some ignorant 20-somethings care more about Gaza than America.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It would be tragic if Democrats lost the election because some corrupt boomers care more about continuing to enable genocide than America. Particularly after we finally had some goddamned hope.

[–] imposedsensation 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You're confused. Both sides are complicit, neither wants a resolution. Let them fight.

[–] BoredPanda@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Both sides" hate each other because the conflict is over a century old by now. Both sides use terrorism against each other too. That does not mean that both sides are in the right. Is the bully who is stealing the lunch money as morally justified to fight the bullied victim, as the bullied victim who is merely trying to stop the bully from stealing their lunch money?

Do you also look at other atrocities throughout history and blame the victim for hating and fighting against their oppressor?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Both sides are complicit

That doesn't mean we have to be.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

because ~~some ignorant 20-somethings~~ people of all ages with principles care ~~more~~ about human rights in Gaza ~~than America.~~

Fixed it for you.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And even if they didn't care about Gaza, do Americans really want a foreign country to have so much influence on their elections and politicians?

Americans who care about America should want to get rid of AIPAC.

[–] imposedsensation 1 points 8 months ago

Most of these posts and comments are foreign influence campaigns meddling in US elections, so do Americans really want foreign posters influencing their elections? Nope. Move along.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Obligatory reminder that Trump will be substantially worse for Gaza so it's still wrong

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I completely agree that not voting or voting for Trump would be cutting off your nose to spite your face.

What I'm saying isn't that people SHOULD do either. I'm saying that it's a bad idea to give people who would do such a thing a knife, figuratively speaking.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I find it interesting how the agency and duty is always with the voters to swallow a turd, rather that with the politicians to offer non-turds.

[–] imposedsensation 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe more voters than you think actually want the turd. Most Americans can't find Gaza on a map let alone give a shit about it.

But of those who do, faced with a choice between Israelis or Palestinians controlling that region, they're probably going to choose Israel every time. Neither side wants to coexist. And when you lose a war, you don't typically get much agency.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Entirely possible, but the argument strikes me... oddly Republican. As in it's on a surface level short-sighted, in that it's pandering to the base and calling it "will of the people", regardless of long term repercussions, and deep-level ideological, in that it anchors this "will of the people" on a presupposed silent majority, that just so happens to always agree with the party heads.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If the Democrats were supporting a Genocide by the KKK in Detroid would that prevent you from voting for them?

[–] imposedsensation 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You're not even making sense.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

They're trying to argue that we give less weight to tragedies that happen elsewhere as opposed to in your own backyard.

BUT federal government has less international power than they do in their own country (obviously) so it's an argument in bad faith. This is assuming that "Detroid" is meant to be Detroit and not a fictional planet great value Metroid.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm just wondering where the line is. I really thought everyone claiming to have morals would draw it at Genocide but apparently I'm the minority.

[–] imposedsensation 3 points 8 months ago

Put your own mask on first...

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] asyncopation@lemm.ee 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not a terrible pick, but Tim Walz makes so much sense.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can you give me your reasons why you like them?

[–] asyncopation@lemm.ee 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, speaking in terms of why he could bring more votes:

  • He was a teacher for 20 years and has a Midwestern small town vibe that could appeal to a lot of voters
  • He has so much charisma and isn't afraid to call out far right leadership, but he does it in a way that does not alienate that voter base. He has even taken his message to fox news.
  • He started the whole "weird" thing that is now being used effectively to nullify Trump and Vance's empty rhetoric.
  • His record as gov in Minnesota speaks for itself
  • He's very popular among labor unions

You really need to listen to him speak to understand his potential impact. Here's a 10 min video containing a few of the interviews I've seen (after the short intro): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1-nR3dRCAM

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Thank you for the great comment. Point 2 in particular I think is really important.

[–] charles@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I am the senate!

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hes the smart pick, but money overpowers smarts

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Captain Spaceman wants the astronaut. What a surprise.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Look... it's not what our country can do for you, it's the really cool space stuff that you can do for the country.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Please please please, now is not the moment for an additional new minority to make the ticket. It's already gonna be hard for many people to vote for a woman, and an Indian. We need the most vanilla white christian male to be Kamala's running mate.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

We need the most vanilla white christian male to be Kamala's running mate.

That's what Hillary did with Tim Caine and we all know how THAT turned out..

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hillary picked Tim Kaine as a "Fuck you" to progressives.

Hopefully Harris is smarter than that.

EDIT: Shouldn't have followed your lead. It's spelled with a K.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You think Hillary's VP's demographics had anything to do with her losing? No, that's not correct.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

It was one of the many mistakes of hers that put her within cheating distance of the most unqualified and personally heinous candidate in American presidential history, yes.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Sure didn't help.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I can remember most President/VP tickets, but didn't even recognize Kaine at all... I must have completely tuned out after she screwed Bernie.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

That or you don't remember him because he's the human equivalent of white bread with unsalted butter.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

She didn't screw Bernie, she crushed him, as much as I hate to admit it. Believing that Bernie got screwed, rather than beat, is the equivalent of believing trump got screwed, rather than beat.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They were times when he was within 5%, and his campaign also outraised her. My issue is not with the voting, but the numerous instances where the DNC put its thumb on the scale, and utterly disregarded progressives.

Harris got crushed during the presidential primary, but with the right framing we see how much potential she really has.

We will never know how much potential Bernie had, and that would be okay if we all felt like he got a fair shot and lost. Thats how you disenfranchise people. But some of that energy is back, and hopefully the DNC doesn't make the same mistakes.

Don't let Trump's delusions about the election make you forget the clear facts that a "fuck billionaires" tax-the-wealthy candidate is going to be going head to head with real and actual institutionalized obstruction from big money donors.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

They were times when he was within 5%, and his campaign also outraised her.

If we're talking about right at the beginning when he won NH, sure. But she went on to clean up in the next few primaries and it was a run away from there. It was closer than expected, but it was never much of a race.

The irony being that the DNC rules actually favored sanders, and he got the most positive coverage in the media. The DNC bad mouthing him was wrong, and giving her debate questions was also wrong and 'putting their thumb on the he scale.' But the idea that he got screwed is not the reality. These were minor at best, and he got absolutely destroyed.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

I'll vote for Kamala Harris regardless of who she picks for Vice.

Do any of the candidates for VP not have this issue?

[–] Jarmer@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago

Let's go Andy Beshear!