this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024

301 points (100.0% liked)

Games

36805 readers

2011 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

301

The Verge Under Fire For Publishing Info About ‘Deadlock,’ Valve’s Secret Shooter (www.forbes.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

104 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 142 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Valve gives you access to a game and tells you not to spew your mouth off. A gentleman's agreement if you will.

You spew your mouth off and valve takes access away.

shocked pikachu face

This is a non-issue of you ask me. A person, who happens to be a writer, got access to the game through a steam friend and was asked not to talk about it but thought they could just not agree to a warning and write about it anyway? I got access too and i didnt write about the game. I get to go back and play it today, they cant.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So what. They already have their article and it will be out anyways within like two years latest probably. The value of talking about deadlock is much higher and valve profits from this advertising as well.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago (6 children)

The so what is that this writer for the verge will likely never be trusted with NDA type pre-release access for any other games going forward, and this may even impact all of the Verge.

This isn't just a one and done kind of issue, this will be seen by the entire industry as a "can't trust that guy with pre-release access"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

The Verge isn't pulling the article and they are currently backing their journo. The whole site is blacklisted at this point.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Except this is a game industry reputation ruined. It isn't just valve, why would any dev ever give the verge access again knowing that they will not only disrespect your requests but bitch and moan if you hold them to it.

It's a full rep killer. They will never have early access again for any company.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's not how this works. The Verge didn't break an NDA or embargo because they didn't get either of those things. Valve allows random people to invite other random people to play, with just a "pretty please don't talk about this game" warning. There was already people talking about it online and leaked footage.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)

They didn't break any laws, they broke trust. Random people can leak all they want, they don't have institutional standing and respect. If what you said was true then it'd be pretty weird that every other institutional news, even gaming focused ones, have honored that request. Because doing otherwise is a dick move that kills your reputation, and the gaming industry is legendary for blacklisting for far less disrespectful moves. Downright petty with it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

even if it doesn't, they lose consumer respect as well, I personally won't engage verge anymore because as someone who wants to go into the development trade, it puts a bad taste of any platform to blatantly disrespect a creators wishes like that.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 93 points 7 months ago

I can’t believe their secret game they gave to 10 thousand people got leaked

[–] [email protected] 79 points 7 months ago (13 children)

I think the thing everyone is forgetting is that valve isn't stupid, there's no way they didn't realize you could work around accepting the (legally unenforcable) NDA, and it's open invite.

Valve 100% knows that keeping it "secret" is good for hype and was expecting this to happen at any time, and the nominal ban was expected, but nobody is gonna get sued either.

More people are talking about Valve's "secret" new game because of this than would be if they openly announced it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah exactly. It's quite likely they didn't really blacklist The Verge anyways, just won't send them invites any more for this particular game. Best kind of marketing is hype marketing, and this is how you fuel the hype.

load more comments (12 replies)

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What was so secret about it?

[–] [email protected] 91 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

So apparently they had a bit asking players to not share info about the game, but you could technically back out of it without agreeing so legally they can post whatever they want. It feels like a case of "this is legal to do but maybe kinda shitty and valve might be upset". Basically the agreement was informal and not enforceable and the verge just said fuck it. They did get banned afterwards, but I think that and not working with them in the future is all valve can do.

Edit: didn't even require agreement, so honestly it's kinda fair game. I was a bit hostile calling it shitty, I felt like it was a loophole or something but it's more Valve just saying "hey pls don't" and the verge replying "no thanks", and eating the game ban since that's all valve can really do.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If 10,000 people are doing something, it is NOT secret, and journalists must report on it for the general benefit of society.

Valve has their head in the clouds if they thought they could keep an informal secret among the population of a small town.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 7 months ago (3 children)

This isn't some grand conspiracy it's a closed beta for a video game. It's pretty normal to have an NDA or embargo agreement to get access. It sounds like valve just goofed the implementation. So yeah it's totally legal for them to post it, valve just might avoid giving them early copies in the future.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Totally. Verge just lost their access to breaking gaming news. They'll be blacklisted from now on.

That said, I don't know anyone who goes to The Verge for breaking news on gaming.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no NDA for Deadlock, and anyone in it can invite anyone they want, as often as they want. It's not like Valve has no idea how to privately test their game. I think they made these decisions deliberately.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

A bit of the eula says not to share info about the game, but you can literally back out without accepting the eula, and still play. So I don't know if I'd call it intentional, but there's definitely no legal reason they can't post whatever they want. They just got banned for it and might have damaged their relationship with valve somewhat. Depends on how much valve cares tho.

Edit: it wasnt even a eula apparently, just a "pls dont tell people ok?" Pop up. Thanks to the folks clarifying <3

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's no EULA just like there's no NDA. That pop up and a one sentence post about not sharing info about the game on the forum is all there is.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Don't know why you're getting crushed for this. It's not even just about this particular game; one of the major players in the largest entertainment industry on the planet is doing something highly unusual. That's in the public interest.

Lemmy users should know better, too, as The Verge was one of the leading reporting outlets on what happened on Reddit last year. Adversarial tech journalism is part of what they do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Adversarial journalism is always spun as "journalism out of line" when this is the foundation of all journalism.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

There isn't even an informal agreement. It simply says not to share anything. Not even "by playing this, you agree not to share anything". It's just "please don't share anything" without any action required by your side.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Valve got burned many ages ago with Half-Life 2 and they only go to press about a game when it's in the final phases of development, to release.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (8 children)

It's just bad faith reporting. It reminds me of Kotaku sneaking into conventions before they opened to report what games were there.

It lowers my opinion of The Verge, I used to think they were at least reputable with standards, but that's a real tabloid move.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

they were at least reputable with standards

I think you must be talking about a different website?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

They literally included a screenshot of valve asking to not share information about the game with a little quip about how they pressed escape instead of ok. Blantant disrespect to valves wishes even if it's not a legally binding agreement.

They chose getting clicks over doing right by valve. Shame on them.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago

Clickbait title. I can't find any justification for calling a player being banned as The Verge "under fire".

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Decent thing to do would have been ask valve for time when they want the article published

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (6 children)

They did ask Valve:

Though Valve didn’t respond to my requests for comment

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why wouldn’t they just put journalists they gave access to under embargo?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (9 children)

It's not clear if he actually got access from Valve or from a friend or someone else. The article simply states

Earlier today, I received a no-strings-attached invite to play Deadlock on Steam.

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

At the end of the day, the editors will have to answer to not receiving access to Valve for statements or tips moving forward.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Honestly I don't think valve is as mad as you would think

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Too bad the game itself doesn't sound very interesting.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh but it is very very fun. Addicting even. Full time job and business owner and in the last 5 weeks I've logged 125hrs.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Leaked".

All leaks are deliberately orchestrated to fan the hype train.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Lol no definitely not all

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (16 children)

And at the end of the day....it's just an ok game.

load more comments (16 replies)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Eh. I find it difficult to have any sympathy for Valve. Sounds like it was only a matter of time before someone did this. If anything this is just free marketing.

load more comments