this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
864 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30065 readers
2749 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 113 points 6 months ago (21 children)

"Know" is a stretch. Plants respond to attack by releasing chemicals (e.g. nettles and grasses), curling or retracting their leaves (e.g. acacia), or by changing their morphology (e.g. holly); but they have no nervous system - let alone a brain - so it's not like you're killing an animal.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 108 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Plants having no nervous system is being challenged with the idea that the plant itself is its central nervous system.

They react to stimulus, they emit sounds (different ones when in “pain”), and communicate with each other.

They don’t have consciousness in a way we understand

I dont mean this as a “dunk” but more of a how neat is that

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (19 children)

It's always funny to me how people eat up the concept of a distrubuted neural network in tech but scoff at the same idea applying to something like a tree or a fungus.

Pando is the largest organism by area, and the Humungous Fungus is the largest by mass. The idea that those organisms don't "think" in some way is laughable.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"In some way" is doing A LOT of heavy lifting there. ... although in the general sense, agreed.

Especially given how many outright wrong or otherwise assinine conclusions some "thinking" animals come to... Perhaps communicative consciousness is overrated on the intelligence scale.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 31 points 6 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (6 children)

They have the knowledge and are doing something about it. If other plants can send out this chemical by observing it themselves, that sounds like a reaction from a communication. It may not be cognition like we expect but it is behaving like cognition would. Hard to argue that plants don't know or care of their friends start dying.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 74 points 6 months ago

Lemmyworld admins be like

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 55 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Let's assume for a moment that somehow your salad was conscious. That's an even bigger reason not to eat an animal that has to be fed on plants for a long time.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Or maybe its just a fundamental fact of life that something has to die in order for you to live and virtue signaling about the degree to which you participate in that death is a pointless exercise.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the old "I accidentally stepped on a fly, might as well exterminate the whole biosphere" defense

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

"our new cancer drug is 99% effective!"

"So it doesn't work in 1% of cases? Then what's the point, throw it away, we just have to accept that cancer is going to happen"

[–] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

These arguments are exactly why people hate vegans. It's nonsense.

Not only do you jump to an insane straw man. You showcase that you ignore a clear increasing contradiction around your world view and choose reactionary nothing.

If you care about life realize the harder question. If you care about the environment realize clear inefficiencues. Currently, you showcase nothing more than crude thoughtlessness.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not a vegan but it's foolish to think that vegans aren't objectively correct. Let's even say that plants are conscious beings on the level of cows or pigs. The conditions these plants are grown in are a million times better than that of the average factory farm animal. Additionally, in order to sustain ourselves on cows and pigs, exponentially more of these conscious plants need to be killed to fatten the conscious animals we are eating.

If we just ate the plants instead there would be several orders of magnitude less suffering in the word, antibiotic resistant bacteria would be a less immediate issue, a significant amount of our greenhouse gas emissions would disappear, and we'd all probably be healthier to boot.

Yes, something has to die in order for any organism to continue it's existence. Let's not pretend that only plants dying aren't a better alternative in every way to animals dying in order to further our collective existence. You accuse vegans of being reactionary but your comment smacks of knee-jerky defensiveness for something you seem to understand is wrong

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Not only do you jump to an insane straw man.

It wasn't an insane strawman though? It was literally the argument they made. Something has to die for you to eat, therefore it doesn't matter how many things you kill or how necessary those deaths are. The fact that you must kill something absolves you of any guilt for any amount of killing, is the ridiculous argument the person made (and which carnists often make) which we are making fun of for being obviously evil and wrong.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not a vegan. Their argument was literally that morally there is no difference in the amount of death caused by any person for the purposes of consumption.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago

This logic doesn't make sense in any other context. Like, if I say we should try to reduce CO2 levels in the atmosphere, you could point out that emitting CO2 is a fundamental part of human life, so something something virtue signaling blah blah blah. Just because something is unavoidable to a certain degree doesn't mean we shouldn't try to minimize it.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or maybe there's happy middle where everyone can live comfortably while keeping the harm we cause at a minimum.

Or, at the most selfish, we could make sure we don't kill ourselves this decade or the next.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 54 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Carnivores eat animals that eat a lot more plants than humans could ever eat.

That's why I only eat baby animals. They only drink milk, which hurts no one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chev@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Everybody needs to eat stuff. And if it is about reducing pain and having a better climate impact, you should plants all the way. A cow eats 50 times the amount of plants that it gives back in meat.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (10 children)
[–] chetradley@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

I'm afraid I'm going to need a better argument than "I support killing animals because it makes me feel good."

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

There's a type of person that thinks Joe Rogan is clever because they agree with him.

[–] Banichan@dormi.zone 36 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Those poor cats. Vegans shouldn't be allowed to own meat.

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Dogs taste better anyways. Can’t beat a good Elwood’s steak!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago (10 children)

I am mostly vegan and my cat and dog eat mostly meat 🖕

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago (11 children)

"Plants rights activists" out in full force in this thread lol

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

it's not that they want to reduce plant suffering. it's that they don't care if plants suffer.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's no way this won't restart the same argument with someone, huh? Top-tier shitpost, well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago (6 children)

That's why I only eat fungi. It'll be reciprocal eventually.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yo fuck that propagandist piece of shit Joe Rogan. Keep him off of my feed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

I mean if you stretch the definition enough even cells know they are being eaten. they usually respond by "shit this cant be good, I better press this big red button"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There was a Hungarian cult that convinced others that people can survive by eating light. There were some deaths and was quickly shut down, but they exist forever in anorexia-related jokes.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

I think you're talking about Breatherism? There've been a couple of those cults all over Europe. It's not particularly popular, luckily, but they often make it to the newspapers, because someone usually dies.

It originates from Hinduism though. There's a another Indian religion called Jainism. These are the monks you see brushing away the beetles before their feet, to not step on them. It's very much about nature and spiritualism and being good. Fasting is a key concept of this religion and the most extreme cases will choose to fast until death to cleanse the world. This is all very spiritual though and takes years of preparation.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Ew, Joe Rogan.

[–] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago

Do y'all not eat vegetables too?

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 13 points 6 months ago

Their fault for dressing so sexy

[–] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Joe Rogan 🤮

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Finally we have one thing to pin on like 3 weird vegans.

load more comments