this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
225 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

9621 readers
806 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While Canadians Struggle, ~~Energy~~ Corporations Are Laughing All the Way to the Bank

Fixed that for you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Makes you wonder why everyone doesn't incorporate, thus allowing every single one of us to laugh all the way to the bank. Perhaps we fear success?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We fear prosecution for fraud and tax evasion, because we can't afford corporate lawyers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

You could if you were incorporated. Perhaps you missed @[email protected]'s comment?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sure, but do all Corporate sectors get dozens of billions in direct and indirect subsidies year after year?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

"What's this about subsidies???" —Elon, probably

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I think so, yeah? Is the answer yes?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And they will cry and obtain more subsidies and tax cuts while we get fucked in every hole.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At this point I would rather Canada struggle to make work for the people displaced by the loss of O&G than continue to fuel their bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

is good day to be on fediverse

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

for example through strategic price controls on energy, food, and other key inputs

I don't know why anyone ever takes Jacobin seriously at this point.

The solution to rising food costs is not, in fact, to exacerbate the problem by giving producers a strong incentive to not produce food.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Agreed, the level of concentration in grocery distribution is worse than the telecoms. At this point they need to be broken up and run as non-profits!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

the level of concentration in grocery distribution is worse than the telecoms.

Telecoms can fall into being natural monopolies for technical reasons, like there only being so much radio spectrum to go around. Grocery distribution, not so much. Literally anyone can start selling groceries right now.

Which, during the height of COVID, when going to restaurant was not allowed, we saw exactly that – a number of restaurants transitioned into being grocery stores.

We had our chance to change our ways. Nobody wanted to. There is concentration in the grocery business because that's what we desire. Plain and simple.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

This has nothing to do with price ceilings on food being a universally bad decision.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's hilarious. The formal definition of shortage is a situation where an external mechanism, such as government intervention, prevents price from rising. This is literally looking to create a shortage (a real shortage, not the pretend kind we talk about when it comes to labour) of food and energy.