this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
642 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23508 readers
3813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 151 points 7 months ago (7 children)

[email protected]

Any third party that's telling you to vote for them under FPTP, but isn't heavily promoting RCV to fix the system, isn't trying to win. They're trying to spoil the FPTP election.

RCV is already law in a surprisingly large number of places. It may change the majority in the house in this upcoming election, because the difference in vote-counting within the two states that use it for US congressional elections might be enough to change the razor-thin outcome.

RCV is on the ballot, in one form or another, in 7 states and DC this year. Go vote. You might be able to fix the system, and move toward the future that all the people in this thread who are being vocal about Jill Stein say that they want. Remember back when marijuana was illegal? That changed. This can change too, and it would be glorious, for a lot of important goals that a lot of people claiming to support Jill Stein claim they're supportive of. It would be practical and realistic. It would work.

Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven't been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What's your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

The answer is obvious, of course. But it's fun to ask.

@[email protected], why?

I'll add more @s as more people pipe up. They always do.

Register and vote, for RCV as well as for Harris. We have 25 more days.

https://www.vote.org/

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Yeah we need a party that supports RCV, not this fake 3rd party bullshit. Lemme see, which party supports RCV?

https://www.gp.org/tags/rcv

Oh the Green Party. That’s… kind of awkward for your point, isn’t it?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I'll just leave this here

Harris wouldn't get my vote anymore than Trump would get yours. Fascism or fascism light is still fascism.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Paraphrase from Historian Kevin Kruse:

"No, l'm not voting [for the better one of the two major parties in a first past the post system] this election. But rest assured that when the Trump administration starts arresting my nonwhite neighbors and forcing them onto the trains, I'm going to have a pretty big frown on my face. That way, everyone will know it's not my fault."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I didn't ask whether David Doonan had published a press release on a janky web site which was mostly complaining about Democrats trying to remove Green Party members from the ballot, in this FPTP election. This also somehow finds a way to blame the lack of RCV on the Democrats, when a lot of them support it. Here's a list:

https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/ranked-choice-voting/endorsers/

I don't see any Green Party people there. I have never heard Jill Stein talk about it, and I've heard her say a bunch of things. That's strange to me. But regardless of that, that's not what I asked. I also didn't ask whether you plan to vote for Kamala Harris. My question was:

Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven’t been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What’s your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

Do you want to answer that question? You don't have to. You can change the subject again, if you'd like to.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Your comment is fascist and while I was reading it my fascist shoes became untied. I would tie them but the strings are fascist. I apologize for using so many fascist letters in my words. At least periods aren't fascist... yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The most important youtube video in politics:

Https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 7 months ago (8 children)

"Once noble party" - ffs.

Jill Stein is a bad actor in this election, she understands how the electoral college works and she understands she's weakening the democratic party position. But let's not blame shift - the Democrats could be much better on climate change then they are today and if they were better Stein's BS wouldn't have such an easy time attracting voters. I dislike the title posing it as "Stein may hand Trump the whitehouse again."

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Even if the argument about getting X% of votes was true, the states to campaign heavy in would be the deep blue/red states. Especially since they tend to get ignored by candidates.

Instead she sticks to the states where <30k votes could decide the election and the market is saturated with the most expensive ad costs

It's blantantly obvious what's she's doing.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Without 3rd party options we still wouldn't vote for people that don't represent us.

[–] aubeynarf 43 points 7 months ago (15 children)

funny that with instant runoff voting, your vote would go to a larger party as soon as your fringe candidate got eliminated.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (10 children)

So you're saying that Jill Stein, the Russian asset who is actively working to get Donald Trump elected president, represents you and your group?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

2016 Michgan election results

Michigan 2016

I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Can't believe Johnson handed the election to Trump like that.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Even without him, Stein had it handled by herself. Why do you think she’s back? Jr, who was funded by a Repub PAC, dropped out. Then Stein re-appeared.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Jill Stein is polling at litterally less than measurable numbers.

https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3913&stream=top

"Undecided" represents at least twice the voters Stein appears to be garnering.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago (24 children)

People just want someone to be mad at in case Harris loses

Because Harris losing simply could not be her own fault, if it happened

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (30 children)

There is a world in which it's not her fault or anyone else's fault. You can run a flawless campaign and lose for reasons beyond your control, or any other single stakeholder's control.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

What kills me about this is if the neolib dems had taken just a moment at the primary to cast their vote for undecided to show the Dem leadership that genocide was a non negotiable issue they should do the right thing on, it might have worked.
It would have cost absolutely nothing, and we might be coasting to an easy victory right now. Instead we're here.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (7 children)

100%

But look around this place. Its still the same Blue MAGA here trying to bash peoples head in (now for Harris, then for Biden) as before.

The same people that would demand we drive off a cliff with Biden at the wheel are the ones insisting that we need to support Harris in-spite of her genocide policy, instead of trying to move her on the issue. Like we literally need her to fix her policy or she literally can't get elected. And its self-evident in the data we have. She's now losing, not even accounting for the structural biases we should very much expect from RW fuckery and the EC.

Like just come out against genocide. Its fucking easy. It can be a fucking lie. Just fucking lie to us so we can convince enough people to get you elected Harris.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Man. I wonder if we are going to lose. Its definitely possible at this point, but hard to imagine. How awful are our dem candidates to lose to an insane peice of human trash like Trump

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It was nice to see the World News community finally realize that the DNC has been doing nothing but shooting themselves in the foot for a year.

Maybe this community will finally catch on and connect the dots between a random ass 3rd party getting blamed for stealing votes away from the Democrats, and Democrats not actually meeting the core demands of their constituency.

Or maybe not....

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Maybe someday we'll have people blame the DNC for choosing to back unpopular opinions/policies losing the popularity contest against "Literal Evil Fascist with the Playbook of How To Do Evil 101, but Fox News said it's cool".

But instead we need a new scapegoat for when Greens come in 4th place to the Libertarian's "I just wanna date this 14 year old with my rifle and say the N-word out loud without backlash."

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

2016 Pennsylvania results

Pennsylvania 2016

I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (24 children)

I don't understand why it is taken for granted that if Stein wasn't a candidate the people who vote for her would be voting for the Democrats instead. Just as likely they would not vote at all or vote for some other protest candidate.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hillary handed trump the WH last time

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Okay, maybe it's not so black and white.... But she definitely contributed.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pied Piper, ignoring the rust belt, a shit candidate with shitty politics. She overwhelmingly contributed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago (3 children)

guys it's not that hard, all we have to do is to not vote for still jein.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Its the genocide thats the problem-- Steins numbres are small.. And Jill Stein owes the dems nothing, she can run if she wants. Thats what democracy is about. So the new republic can suck it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

Jill Stein has my vote! Seriously, she took it. Can someone help me get it back?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

2016 Wisconsin election results

Wisconsin 2016.

I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That’s a weird way to say “Harris ticket fails to motivate voters to their side”

To clarify, Stein is a literal compromised grifter.

So is most of the RNC. I remember that 4th of July emergency flight to Moscow to hand deliver a letter to Putin.

It’s not hard to beat these people. Unless you’re liberal I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Kamala Harris can win over all of those Jill Stein voters with a single sentence.

Stupid Jill Stein's entire campaign is based on the premise that Democrats would keep a genocide going for an entire year into election season.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (16 children)

Let’s completely forget everything but the election for this hypothetical. Do you think Harris coming out and saying “I will immediately stop supporting Israel” she will automatically win? Or do you think it’s more likely the Jewish community would condemn her words and move over to the rubber stamp in chief who would give Israel even more support with fewer conditions? (Ignoring the personal favors he asks for of course.)

Yall act like this is a simple black and white issue, when it’s obviously not. Even when you boil it down to “just” the election.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If Trump wins it's not Jill Stein's fault you psycho.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Technically you’re right. But it absolutely will be the non-voters fault, and considering that a vote for Shill Stein is the same thing as throwing away a vote for no good reason…

It’s say it’ll be her supports fault.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Jesus fucking Christ. You win by getting more people to vote for you! If Harris loses, it will be her own fault.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Democracy, where you have freedom of speech except if you speak about Israel, or your own country war crimes, or your own country foreign policy, or trying to run for office if you are not Democrat or Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Jill Stein isn't going to hand Trump anything. Only people who vote for Trump can do that.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›