To add to the pile of evidence that this is all just hateful bigotry and has nothing to do with children's safety, cisgender children can still legally access these drugs, but not for the purpose of transitioning genders. The same drugs can still be used to delay aggressive puberty, which is a standard and relatively common usage, as well as other conditions that might affect a cisgender child. But a trans child who needs the same drugs for a different reason, will be told too bad, you're out of luck. So two children could walk into the same doctor's office and one will be turned away and forced to suffer through their gender dysphoria, with permanent repercussions for their mental health and body, and the other child will be treated with the drugs they need to be treated with. It's absurdly unfair, unequal, and purposefully harmful to a vulnerable population.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Tbf there are all kinds of medicine that are ok for one thing but not another, cocaine for instance.
Yeah. Cocaine is ok if you're trying to get an edge on the competition as a stock trader. But, not ok if you're black.
The difference being, in this case, that this type of hormone treatment is a medically responsible and widely accepted treatment for both things.
I don’t disagree with you at all.
It wasn’t me arguing against the post, just thinking out loud basically.
I like the philosophy aspect of finding where the line is.
I do it with like everything.
Figure this one out, usually people find things that are fluffier less edible, but a squirrel and a rat are essentially the same animal but people will totally eat squirrel, but I don’t ever hear of people commonly eating rat even when other food is available.
The fluffiness actually works against it.
A pigeon and a dove are the same damn thing only differently colored.
Most people wouldn’t eat a pigeon, but they would eat a dove or a squab
The problem is that you're not the one deciding what drug to prescribe. The government is.
And even if you were, shouldn't the decision on "where to draw the line" be made by the parent, the child, and their doctor?
We can have all the philosophical conversations you want but we have people who are being affected by this right now.
We can have all the philosophical conversations you want but we have people who are being affected by this right now.
Yeah, this is why I downvoted the original "cocaine" comment.
Even if it was "thinking out loud," it's just an absurd thing to say when we are talking about children's lives here.
The fluffiness of the animal is kind of irrelevant? Rats and pigeons are generally perceived as potential disease carriers, regardless if they are more likely than squirrels or doves to carry.
HRT and puberty blockers are preventative medicine. Specifically, they prevent that incurable disease known as suicide.
Are you implying that it's okay for cisgender folks to get HRT and gender-affirming care, but it's not okay if for transgender folks to seek the same care? Explain to me how your assertion here applies to what we're talking about.
Doctors aren't prescribing cocaine for the hell of it, though. Same thing with puberty blockers. Think we can trust doctors' judgment when it comes to the drugs they prescribe.
Ken Paxton is a blight on humanity.
Who will rid me of this troublesome AG
Time, eventually
That's cold comfort for his current victims.
I hope you aren't insinuating Ken Paxton is human. He's hardly even organic.
It's important to remember that these people are also human.
As doctors continue to flee the state
My doctor closed her practice in the state. She's the kindest doctor I've ever had the pleasure of dealing with, and I'm sad that I have to find a new one.
Fuck Ken Paxton. I hope he gets trapped in quicksand inhabited by starving sand fleas.
Or maybe strapped to a tree in a forest full of hungry grizzly bears
Yes, although that would arguably be too quick 🤔
Or maybe strapped to a tree in a forest full of ~~hungry~~ horny grizzly bears. Is that better?
How about covered with honey and tied down on top of a nest of fire ants?
Quick sand is a far too awesome way to go for someone like this.
This doc is a hero!
Also, wouldn’t it be cool to send a message to Paxton, and send a few fed lawyers to be her defense…. ? (Biden… I’m looking at you.)
I met this dude a few years ago and he is straight up nuts. It wasn't like a brief thing. I spent hours with him. He's as much of a douche bag as he seems like. I remember him bragging about all the lawsuits he filed against the Biden administration - something like 80+ - and ranting about the stolen election. It amazes me that he holds elected office. He's a twat.
The doctor or the attorney general?
The AG. I didn't think there would be any confusion as to who I was referring to. LOL
The elected doctor. /s
Jk, I had a hard time pinpointing the target of speech as well, the final comment about holding elected office was the only indicator I found. Most people are really poor communicators/writers, eh?
I mean also all the lawsuits he filed against the Biden administration makes it seem more likely it's the conservative ag and not the liberal doctor...
Paxton gets mentioned on almost a weekly basis and it's always something scummy that he's done. I assumed he was the only douche bag in this story. Then there's the lawsuits against the Biden administration, complaints about a stolen election, and the part about being elected. I figured that was enough context to indicate who I was talking about. Maybe the doctor is a douche bag too, but I didn't meet him so I don't know.
Reminder that Texas has been Republican controlled for 28 years.
They've been voting for this reality for decades. People should move away from Texas.
Reminder that Texas's legislature and Congressiinal delegations were majority Democrat for 150 years, and it wasn't until the boost from W's Presidential election that they got their first majority.
They then gerrymandered the shit out of the state out of cycle (it has been redistricted in response to the 2000 census the previous session) to flip it from majority-democrat to a 2/3rds Republican delegation to the House in a single election cycle.
Texas isn't nearly as red as people think. They got a slim majority in 2000 and 2002 and then rigged the game with gerrymandering and voter suppression.
Ken Paxton is a ghoul
America, home of the free.
and 'dont tread on me' texas of all places
It's more like this:
Some people are more like this in texas
Allegedly this doctor is a hero
Is this the worst Republican in the bunch? Could be.
Politician, perhaps. But I'm going to have to put a spotlight on Jonathan Mitchell, who came up with the structure behind the Texas Heartbeat Bill, which did an end run around judicial review by allowing enforcement via civil action by damn near anyone. The usual way to legally dispute a potentially unconstitutional law is to sue the government officials that enforce it, but because there wasn't a specific person there was no real way to bring it to the judicial branch.
Why does he look like that alien from Men In Black that's basically just a giant space roach wearing a human's skin?
Ken "Edgar" Paxton
rabid little twat aint he
If he wanted to find a criminal, just look in the mirror.
Misread the title as implying people under 21 are minors in Texas.