A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Musk is in regular contact with Putin, who makes suggestions about where Star link be turned off, or denied access to.
Bezos prevented the Washington Post from endorsing Kamala Harris.
Netflix is helping Israel dehumanize and erase Palestine and Palestinians.
A normal day in the US of A.
That's freedom fellow Americans
CANCEL CULTURE
But have you considered that it's working for them, now?
Remember... There is not a single corporation that gives a shit about you beyond your LTV (lifetime value) as a paying customer. "Pride week" and "Palestinian stories" type things are just mechanisms to get your money.
If they are told they make more money harming you, CEOs literally have a legal responsibility to choose that option. And right after they do, they will have an amazing dinner while laughing at how stupid you are and then sleep more peacefully than you have on the single best day of your entire life.
If they are told they make more money harming you, CEOs literally have a legal responsibility to choose that option.
No they fucking don't.
They choose to do so out of greediness the vast majority of the time, but it isn't a legal obligation.
You are actually not wrong but if they dont obey BoD, it is the shed.
Bigger question here if this "simplification" is a valid tactic to communicate the message.
Theoretically BoD could sue the CEO, but i dont think that ever happened in this context... Only in cases of fraud, ie stealing company assets
Something similar has happened. Look up Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co where the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that a ceo must operate in the interest of the shareholders not in the interests of the business and it's employees.
Yes they actually do. Look up Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. A business must be run in the interests of the shareholders, not the public, not the employees, not even the business itself.
Is it morally right? Fuck no. Is it the law? Unfortunately yes.
Grobow v. Perot, 539 A.2d 180 (Del. 1988).
Directors in a business should:
Fair point, I was unaware of this case.
Plenty are greedy psychopaths, I'm not saying the above as a forgiveness, I'm stating it as a fact. A CEO is a legal "corporate officer" of a company. Seems you need to learn a bit more about fiduciary responsibilities for a CEO. It is a legal obligation.
Maybe you'll do some reading, probably not though, huh? The people in your life must be just fucking exhausted by that energy of yours.
It is a legal obligation.
Nope. There are these obligations but it is not illegal for a CEO to perform sub optimally, or even make multi year losses.
And let’s not forget that most significant forms of “harm” are illegal in the first place. The comment above you makes it sound like any minute now, Nabisco might decide it’s more profitable for them to roll out to your house and kill you.
I mean.... if something is illegal but the penalties are low or enforcement nonexistent then it's more like a recommendation. Fines become a "cost of doing business".
Has anyone ever been under the illusion orherwise? I’ve never seen anyone who thought corporations cared about them. And people don’t care about corporations either. They care about getting the shit they want at the price they want and will sleep very soundly if some corporation goes out of business.
Unfortunately I've seen quite a few people argue that companies are kept honest by the market and as such they're trustworthy.
Libertarians writing Invisible Hand fan fiction.
a lot of people have a hard time to believe that facebook, google, microsoft, etc cannot be trusted, or even that they don't have good intentions (anymore?)
Seems you live in a bubble friend.
One of the most popular kids toys are miniature brand name products that the parents buy for them...
people by M&M's branded leather jackets for $300 and walk around as human billboards willingly...
people cover their cars with bumper stickers and get tattoos with logos showing their preferences between competing local coffee shops....
Goop, celebrity-fronted baby brands, etc are "lifestyle brands" where people purchase an identity and defend it against others...
Sports teams are corporations that people literally have bloody fist fights over...
Target is selling a Halloween costume and kids sized shopping carts and checkout stands and their parents are buying them... For money
What in the sweet sticky god damn FUCK are you talking about "was anyone under that illusion"?
Dude, Donald trump is a fucking corporation that elderly people eating cat food donate their pension checks to...
You seem to be delusional if you see NONE of that.
None of that is people thinking corporations care about them. You’re high. Get some sleep.
Let me introduce you to gamers and valve.
From the article:
The films removed from Netflix include "3 Logical Exits"; "3000 Nights"; "A Drowning Man"; "A Man Returned"; "A World Not Ours"; "Ave Maria"; "Bonboné"; "Children of Shatila"; "Chronicle of a Disappearance"; "Condom Lead"; "Divine Intervention"; "Frontiers of Dreams and Fears"; "Ghost Hunting"; "Giraffada"; "Habibi"; "In Vitro"; "Like Twenty Impossibles"; "Maradona’s Legs"; "Mars at Sunrise"; "Omar"; "Salt of this Sea"; "Samouni Road"; "The Crossing"; and "Xenos"
Here is a lovely Federated [PeerTube] collection of films and documentaries about Palestine: https://tube.todon.eu/c/palestine.documentaries/videos?s=1
Woah some of those documentaries make my blood boil
As they should.
Thank ^_^
There is no israel lobby within US companies.
This is just normal moderation to protect the vulnerable
How so?
That was sarcasm
See, that’s what I thought.
I need to spend less time on Israeli news sites and Reddit, but the whole point of visiting those is to see what the others think, but if you put yourself in an echo chamber you only hear the same things and I’m trying to avoid that.
I’ve just seen too many opinions exactly like that lately
Literally just ereasing a culture to make room for the new one.
Dang, I wish there were a term for that...
Since this is the first time in human history it's every happened, we will have to wait to see what word or phrase becomes standard to use. Because if it had happened before, we'd have a definition for it.
And it would probably be super illegal beyond being immoral. Like international communities would all agree that anyone committing such acts would be evil and the good nations of the world would act immediately to defend the victims and stop any government or army from continuing.
At least if it ever happens again we will know better.
I had never even heard of them having this content.
I gave Netflix a chance because of all the Palestinian content (I'm not even shitting) after being unsubbed for over a year since their underhanded tactics on family sharing, but I guess it's time to cancel again.
I can't call that surprising. This is the same Netflix that almost immediately took down the episode of Hasan Minaj's show criticizing Saudi Arabia because the Saudis told them to.
Common netflix L, sail the high seas.
The Intercept - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Intercept:
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.
Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Intercept is generally reliable for news. Almost all editors consider The Intercept a biased source, so uses may need to be attributed. For science, editors prefer peer-reviewed journals over news sources like The Intercept.
MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://theintercept.com/2024/10/25/netflix-palestinian-stories-israel-movies/
How the fuck y'all managing to make this garbage bot even worse? Just stop.
Block it and move on with your life?
I will not turn a blind eye to harmful misinformation.
Then post a correction
It should not be my responsibility to go around posting corrections to misinformation. It should just not be posted in the first place.
Well, be that as it may, you only have 3 options in front of you; you can complain about it, shut up, or post what your problem is and why the others are wrong.
Right now, you haven’t even said what your problem with it is.
What part is misinformation even would be a good place to start.
What do you disagree with here?
Why don't you just block everybody who doesn't like it? Then it can just be you and the bot alone on all the threads.
There's a pinned post right now where you can vote to kill the bot. I ultimately blocked it because it was at best useless - the sources I didn't recognize it didn't either, and I saw it endorsing British tabloids which is outright harmful. Maybe I would have liked the Wikipedia addition, because the spoiler tag works on my Lemmy client, but people already do this in comments in a more relevant way on an article to article basis.
Welcome to the digital age.
I couldn't figure it out from the bit of the article i could see before the pay wall, but is it stated who they license the content from?
Many times these things are licensed in bundles (especially likely if they all showed up on the service at the same time) and they may not have been able to repurchase the license. It wouldn't surprise me if alot of that content is in flux with all the creators/businesses being killed/destroyed.
Is it possible they just decided to nix all that content during the moment in history it's most likely to be viewed outside of its previously very small audience? Sure. It just feels like there's probably something else going on here.