194
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 131 points 8 months ago

Before people shit on Yorke:

Yorke was playing a show in Melbourne, Australia, as part of a solo tour when, according to multiple videos recorded by concertgoers, a man yelled: "Do you condemn the Israeli genocide of Gaza? Already 200,000 [dead], half of them children."

I would have been pissed off at that shit too. Does every entertainer you see have to start their show with a condemnation of Israeli genocide?

It's Thom York, not Joe Biden.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

Could he not just have ignored it? Or had security get them out?

I guess if it was a really small gig then maybe not, but it seems like derailing the gig was giving the jeckler the attention and headline they wanted, no?

[-] [email protected] 90 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He didn't leave and never come back. He just walked off to show the person what a douchebag they were being. Then he came back.

Edit: Here's video (which for some reason shows the end before looping back and showing the start). He literally gave the person a chance to get up on stage and say what they had to say and they wouldn't, so he lost his temper and walked off stage. I honestly do not blame him- https://www.theguardian.com/music/2024/oct/31/thom-yorke-walks-off-stage-after-being-heckled-by-pro-palestine-heckler-at-melbourne-concert

[-] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Fair enough then. I read as he came back and did one song and that was it. Thank you for your clarification. 👍

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Or, since it's genocide and all, answer "yes".

[-] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

What does a British musician have to do with genocide

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Yorke isn't the type to ignore something like that, he takes his ethics very seriously

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yorke was playing a show in Melbourne, Australia, as part of a solo tour when, according to multiple videos recorded by concertgoers, a man yelled: "Do you condemn the Israeli genocide of Gaza? Already 200,000 dead, half of them children."

Yorke could have just said “yes”, but instead he decided to get shirty with the man and then walk off stage.

People in this thread are saying that playing shows in Israel doesn’t mean that he supports the actions of the Israeli government. But what does it mean when he refuses to condemn the genocide?

Ockham’s razor: He supports Israel.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Occam's razor doesn't really apply here... You can't use that to just assert that he supports Israel. Besides, he later did say that he doesn't support Israel.

Honestly, I can understand the response. He's in the middle of a set and someone starts yelling about some political issue... Fuck that, he's here to play a concert. And you know what, I wouldn't want to be backed into making any political statement out of the blue, while on stage.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Occam's razor doesn't really apply here...

Why? Because you like his music?

Haven’t we all been through this with Morrissey?

Even today, any thread about Morrissey will have a few comments about how maybe he isn’t really that racist, despite the now decades of evidence.

Ockham’s razor.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No actually, I don't like Thom Yorke. My problem was with a dumb comment trying to sound logical by throwing fancy words around.

If you want to use Occam's razor in this situation, (a pretty inappropriate situation, because who can truly know what others are thinking or feeling) then I'll show you how that works...

Occam's razor: He walked off because he was in a bad mood and didn't really feel like playing that show in the first place. The crowd comment seemed like a good enough excuse to walk off. That is probably the simplest solution.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Asserting he's a fan in a attempt to discredit and bringing up someone else that has nothing to do with the this. Lmao

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I didn't assert it. I asked. There was a question mark.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

It was both. It was a rhetorical question, which are technically questions while being functionally statements.

It's worth noting though, arguing this semantic point doesn't change anything or win any argument, it's just pedantic.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It was a rhetorical question

It wasn't rhetorical.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"Why won't you let us ignore the genocide in peace"

Shame Radiohead is willingly going to play in Israel during a genocide. Boycotting America is a far more costly move. Avoiding a small place like Israel is so easy. They have not been there in more than five years, why go now?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

Too bad, I liked radiohead. Well, onto my personal BDS list it goes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Radio head is very much peaceful artists.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
194 points (100.0% liked)

News

31214 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS