this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
85 points (98.9% liked)

Politics

10312 readers
13 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marco@beehaw.org 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"Ma'am, I'm gonna have to ask you to leave."

"Do you know who I am?"

"Oh, it's you?!? Get the fuck out of this theatre now, Bitch!"

[–] Tin@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago

Never say Boebert three times.

[–] TheSageRedneck@lemmy.one 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hmmm, nope. Looks like a cheap hooker.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

No need for slut/sex worker shaming. She was being a shitass and is a fascist, that should be the focus

[–] jerome@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Good lord, that dress can barely keep her breasts contained.

Edit: I should clarify that I meant this as an amusing observation (irony and all, with all their hollow talk of "modesty") and not because I give a shit what people wear.

Also, was funny watching her constantly pulling the top up to keep from having a wardrobe malfunction.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Who cares? It is not the reason she was kicked out. Focus on her shitty behavior and leave puritanical shaming out of it.

[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Whoa.

There was no shaming involved (at least not intentionally). People can wear whatever they want. I'm the last person to complain about people's choice of clothing.

It was an (amusing to me) observation, mostly because I found it ironic that she's on the side that praises "modesty" and then doesn't, as usual, practice what nonsense she preaches.

Also, I thought it was really funny how many times she had to keep pulling the top up to keep everything in there.

That's all my comment was. A throwaway observation about something I thought was funny.

Puritanical shaming? Man, sorry if it came across that way.

Edit: Oh, was it the "good lord" bit? I just use that term for comic effect a lot of the time. I forget it's something people say unironically with regard to their beliefs. I see now how that could have been misinterpreted.

I'm used to the term just being random exclamation a lot like how "Jesus Christ" or "OMG" or whatever are used these days. Apologies.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, it very much seemed like you were complaining about how revealing the outfit is without the context of the right being the "modesty" side. That makes much more sense. Most of the time you see someone complain about that kind of thing it is very much from the shaming side.

[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can definitely see how my comment could be interpreted that way.

Lol, I probably should have initially added that context.

Anyway, apologies for the misunderstanding!

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No worries. Thanks for the clarification

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 2 years ago

What kind of alternate dimension did I just wake up in?

This isn't how things are discussed on the internet, it's supposed to devolve into a gibberish of random accusations and ad-hominim attacks!

[–] klyde@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Nah I'm looking at those titties.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

BAH HAH HAH HA!

[–] Can_Utility@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Rumors that her husband, Jason Boebert, exposed his penis when asked for identification are unfounded.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can't wait until somehow this becomes a "woke" issue... "The woke mob threw me out because I love freedumb! That's why the left needs to be exterminated! ... politically exterminated... yeah... that's what I meant... politically..." (wink wink Nazis)

[–] milkjug@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

In other news, garbage human found to be actual garbage.

[–] Maximilious@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Sucks for her, that show is awesome!

[–] furrowsofar@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, we all know who she is. Maybe I am missing something, but I do not think there is anything in the constitution saying you cannot be thrown out of a private venue for being an ass. The only thing I know about is you cannot be detained while Congress is in session. She was thrown out not detained.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

If you can make Boebert say her name backwards, she will disappear from our dimension.

Vaping is enough to kick out anyone

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

Seems to be a lot about this woman America getting a millennial trump ready?