this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
333 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
3176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Webb finds molecule only made by living things in another world::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 115 points 2 years ago (4 children)

To me it’s not a matter of whether live exists anymore, but where it exists

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

While I agree there is a very high probability of life out there, we truly do not know until we can prove it. This evidence JWT found may have another explanation that our scientists are unaware of yet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Also probably simple life, I mean the eycariote cell happened only once on our planet ...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’d be pretty happy to put $100 right now on life being found on almost every planet and moon throughout the galaxy where liquid water exists.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would bet all the money in my savings that life exists somewhere in our galaxy, but I’m not sure I’d do it for every moon with water

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I gave him a dollar

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Im seriously excited to get to Europa

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

In a hose, on a rose, up your nose. Everywhere where life can be is where life goes.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only a 1 sigma confirmation at the moment so needs to be thoroughly reinvestigated

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Sigma is basically a representation of certainty that your result isn’t a statistical fluke. It comes from standard deviation in statistics but 1 sigma is 68% certain. 2 sigma is 95%. 3 sigma is 99.7%.

By convention, astronomy uses 3 sigma for “significance,” meaning you almost definitely found something. Particle physics, since it’s usually done in controlled experiments, usually requires 5 sigma (99.99994%).

It’s similar to margin of error in political polls.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

All of our homies like 3 sigma.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Oh that's where 6 Sigma comes from. TIL

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It’s a number that statistically represents how strong the result is in the data basically. As far as I understand it, with astronomy the typical sigma value expected is 3

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Technically, this is astrochemistry, not astronomy. I don't know what the expected sigma value there is.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

It’s 3 plus/minus 1 sigma

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whats less than 0 sigma? I kid but only a little Astrochemistry is fantastically difficult, it involves large networks of reactions, many of which have multiple orders of magnitudes of uncertainty on their rates. Different groups can tey to model the same conditions and end up with over a factor of 1000 difference in the abundences of key tracer speices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

By saying 1 sigma, they are basically saying tgat are 68% confident in the results. As you increase the sigma, your confidence in the results increases. Here is a site that goes into more in depth explanation: https://news.mit.edu/2012/explained-sigma-0209#

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A chemical only produced by life on earth. But can it be produced by abiotic conditions on other planets? I’m not sure that has been ruled out at this point.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this headline is bullshit. It's indication of possible life, but it isn't what the headline makes it sound. There's always other possible methods, even if we aren't aware of them yet. It's interesting, but doesn't confirm anything yet.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

it picked up hints of a substance only made by living things — at least, that is, on Earth.

What other process could theoretically produce it?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Given the vast differences in atmospheres (or the lack thereof) and their conditions, I wouldn't be surprised if those were the culprits

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are plenty of places on earth where life exists in conditions that seem alien compared to the rest of the planet.

"life finds a way".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

if you have methanol, hydrogen sulfide and enough heat along with a specific rock, it will get formed. or probably methane, hydrogen sulfide and UV

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

there are many ways, and what i'm saying it's likely a massive clickbait

t. organic chemist, currently working with sulfur compounds

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Sadly they cannot be communicated with in a single human life time; assuming they are intelligent and possess the capability to respond.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even if Webb were to basically spot earth 2 5 light years away, I’d caution about getting excited for a radio chat.

Remember that life has existed on earth for something like 3 billion years, but multicellular life has only been around for 500 million or so years, humans in various forms have been around for about a million years, and we’ve only had radio for about a hundred years.

The vast majority of life that has ever existed on our planet has been single called organisms. Finding evidence of any life on another planet is huge news, but we should temper our expectations.

It’s way, way more likely for alien planets to have oceans full of plankton analogues as the dominant life. Considering the rest of this planet’s atmosphere is composed mostly of hydrogen, even their plankton would be weird by our standards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We could irradiate Earth2 with so much RF radiation the crearures of the other planet all develop immune to cancer!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

It's a planet 8x the mass of the earth with a heavy hydrogen atmosphere and is considered very hot, the water is in a super critical state. I think if we found anything it would just be bacterial life.

My bet is on "previously unknown chemistry" creating the chemicals we found. It's never aliens :(

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Time for a new version of the Bible. The Adam and Eve thing is about to look pretty silly.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

about to look pretty silly

Hate to break it to ya...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Just expand on the current one.

God made humans, in his image, because God is a jealous God and wouldn't want humans to be better looking than himself. He filled the world with animals for the humans to hug and eat. On the seventh day He rested.

On the either day, he started on some new planets, then on the ninth day He populated them with more life so that humans might expand to fill the universe he created, and find the life he scattered around for the humans to hug and eat. On the tenth day, he created intelligent life on other planets, because he is all knowing and therefore knows humans won't feel true camaraderie without attacking and wiping out other sentient life forms. On the eleventh day, He declared a public holiday, because He felt like resting but he already decided the Sabbath is every 7 days.

The bible was written by a bunch of religious scholars, and assembled into a series of books. There's no reason they can't "discover" some more books.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›