Imagine the creativity that would flourish if financial interests would invest in new stories rather than beating the corpses of long dead cows for that last morsel of profit.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)
[Dormant, move to [email protected]] Shows and TV
1518 readers
1 users here now
Please move to [email protected]
Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television
- Be nice
- Don't go off topic
- Don't rage farm
Other communities
We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
I can't believe executives aren't looking at this reboot/remake phase and going like "reusing IP is great, let's make new IP so that we can make new franchises"
Creating new IP is a long term strategy that harms short term objectives at the benefit of long term ones.
Most execs are not incentivized to do anything but max this quarters profit. Execs are only concerned with the immediate as their salaries are based on quarterly and annual objectives.
The system is designed to race to the bottom. Who can create the most revenue while providing the very least to the consumer.
Fair point. That's why I wouldn't be shocked to see theatrical re-releases overshadow new movies at the cinemas within the next few years.
That doesn't guarantee number go up.
We must fail to create and learn, without failure there is no growth and sometimes those failures birth something spectacular. Our system has us at a stranglehold, it stifles and discourages creative solutions, and the stories we tell reflect this. There is no future if we continue like this. This is a symptom of a sick system.
Yup. The system doesn't know how to predict properly on new IP. They know that existing IP has an existing fan base and can have its own virality and marketing built in, so they can plug it into these "models" and forecast revenue and stuff so these guys can have jobs. That's why we get another culturally irrelevant live action Disney remake. More of the artform is getting soulless over time.
For those seeing the jokes about needing money, and that's why she's willing.
She took a break from acting to raise her kids. Her and her husband are far from broke.
They could both quit entirely, and would have to develop am 80s level coke habit to blow through their collective assets
TIL MSG now 'maybe' has bills to pay.
Marah Sichelle Gellar?
Metal Solid Gear.
Monosodium glutamate.
Since she’s part of the new Dexter reboot, maybe she saw Michael C Hall’s shiny new car in the parking lot and got to thinking…
Guess she ran out of money
Won't work, she is getting old and young kids are not interested in middle aged buffy.
We do need heroes, just not... That.
Then again, maybe middle aged moms will like it, having watched buffy when they grew up.
You seem to be assuming she would be playing Buffy.
Why would you assume that?
It could be a “tales of the slayers” type of thing where each season is a different slayer from history. It could be a series set 20 years after the finale where Buffy is…maybe not Giles but is more of a mentor-generals don’t typically go to the front lines. Further, the challenges presented by (effectively) superheroes appearing in the world, and being the one responsible for that, would mean a different kind of story.
I see her as the new giles. She could have glasses and act more intellectual because of her years of experience and education on the matter then at some point you have the episode where she reveals how bad ass she can be and the new slayer finds out she was once a slayer.