this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2412 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 months ago (1 children)

so musk will be investigated over how he runs xitter, right?

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’s already investigated himself and found that Xitter is a bastion of freedom. Same goes for Truth Social.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How long until hosting a Lemmy instance is illegal?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well, as a lot of us are on instances hosted outside the US, a very long time.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Compelled speech it is then?

So when are bakers going to be forced to bake cakes for gay couples?

Oh, right, hypocrites. Naturally.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reveling in their hypocrisy won't save anything.

They don't care that you think and I see them as hypocrites.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

It slightly saves my sanity. Only slightly though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For them, them being able to be hypocrites is a "cool thing"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

More accurately, they think everyone is as hypocritical as they are, so the fact they did it in their favor means they "won"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Do as I say not as I do is power of no one stops you.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When they say tech censorship they mean people should be allowed to say bigoted shit

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

And post as much disinformation as they want without "censorship".

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And by "free speech", we mean you have to publish what we tell you.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

Never stops being true.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tomorrow: Trump installs loyalist with zero qualifications as head of FCC.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

You misunderstand. This IS Trump's chosen stooge. FTC Chairman Carr.

He's complaining about tech companies "censoring" conservatives for "speaking their minds", aka being hateful bigots and spreading misinformation during a public health crisis.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I wonder how long until Elmo arrives to "make the FTC more efficient" lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

We need fELONs crack team from X -said no one

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If we wind up in a situation where the EU mandates a form of censorship that the US bans, I assume that the platforms in question would have to separate their EU and US users and sites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splinternet

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not censorship, it's "censorship". You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Generally speaking, when a much stronger party forces upon you a mechanism, it doesn't work in your favor. Whether they call it free speech (for bot campaigns too, while you get banned) or moderation (your opponent insults you in every comment, and they are fine, but you insult them once - you're banned).

The super weirdest thing is that people again and again believe that the strong party belonging to "their" side will do things right this time in history.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I doubt it. They could just sensor based on location.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It should be interesting to see how it plays out, indeed.

I don't expect the US will entirely ban all forms of content moderation. I wouldn't be surprised if the US moved more in the direction of the EU Digital Services Act: required transparency on recommendation algorithms and some sort of NGO trusted flagger system.

Also, similar (but opposite) to Splinternet: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels_effect

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago

Hey government how’s it going

Jesus fucking christ

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

If someone got banned on Reddit for calling Clarence Thomas a house slave like Stephen Candie in Django, can he file a complaint with the FC for tech censorship? Asking for a friend.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I know the point of this is probably just intimidation but 35 companies? Are there 35 social networks that moderate content? Why is Apple included? Is there some conspiracy theory that they’re censoring conservative App Store reviews?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Defunded in 3…2…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

DOGE will soon make cuts there…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Forced speech is just as odious as restricted speech. And with Trump and his band of wreckers, you can be sure that the end state will be a combination of both. Platforms will be forced to disseminate MAGA propaganda, and any user with the temerity to talk back will be banned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This would have been helpful 10+ years ago