this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
263 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23206 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Stay strapped people. This shit is just the beginning. Let's see these jackboots do that while staring at the barrel of a rifle.

Arm yourselves, the nazis already have.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If this was in Idaho, odds are pretty good that most of the people at that meeting are Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

So why show up under armed? Firearms make everyone equal. You think those thugs would have dragged this woman out if they had force being presented? Not a fucking chance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You think those thugs would have dragged this woman out if they had force being presented?

No, I think they would have killed her on the spot.

I think that a show of force is useful, at times. (And if you read through my comments, you'll see that I'm very supportive of individuals in minority groups arming themselves.) I think that large groups of armed protestors that protest peacefully help keep things peaceful. I think that groups like GBGCs showing up to protect Drag Queen Story Hour is a great way to display force. I think being armed is a great way to be able to fight back when someone is threatening to do serious physical harm to you. But in a situation where you're surrounded by hostile people, I think that discretion is perhaps a wiser course. At least, it is if you want to be able to protest another day.

And honestly, I'd rather read a headline about a woman having her right violated than a headline about a women being killed at a town hall because she flashed a gun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm going to shoot myself if I have to read that. Stay strapped.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

What is up with the large number of people here suddenly refusing to read... barely more than a paragraph? Like, this is a text-based site. If you don't want to read, why the hell are you on Lemmy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'd rather hear about someone getting dragged out of a cult rally pretending to be a political event where there were otherwise no injuries, than I would that someone successfully defended themselves from cultists by discharging a firearm.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OK Rambo, I agree with your basic point about everyone in the fight against fascism knowing how to use a firearm, but anyone who draws in this meeting is gonna get gunned down by one of the 40 other people who are carrying. It's Idaho. She got roughed up but at least everyone is still alive.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Still worth a try. Would be really funny

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Is that a compliment or an insult.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As bad as this was, fuck you for suggesting that a shootout with probable fatalities would not have made things worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's right, passive resistance, trust the process, right this way, it's been a long ~~train~~ CyberBus ride, just step into the shower room... ✌️💀 🚿

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I checked Idaho laws and, while I don't think this clears the security firm from all wrongdoing, they actually allow regular citizens to "arrest" other citizens when they observe an "offense" was committed.

This whole section is FUBAR: https://legislature.idaho.gov/statutesrules/idstat/Title19/T19CH6/SECT19-604/

[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Coeur d’Alene city code requires security agents to wear uniforms “clearly marked” with the word “security” in letters no less than 1 inch tall on the front and no less than four inches tall on the back. The security personnel at Saturday’s town hall were in plainclothes, with no visible sign they were security.

They were officially contracted as security, no just average citizens effecting a citizens arrest. They are legally required to identify themselves as security.

Despite multiple opportunities and requests; they actively refused to do so.

IMO that lady had every right to violently defend herself from these unidentified assailants attempting to assault her.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That is not attempted assault. She's gonna be a millionaire, come the lawsuit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just meant she had the right to defend herself as soon as it became apparent they were trying/going to assault her. She didn't have to wait for the assault to actually occur.

come the lawsuit.

If she actually pursues legal action. Sooo many people just let this stuff go... :(

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A go fund me would gather plenty of resource in this case. I hope she goes for it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As of this moment, 4.6K donations. Lots of 5-10-25-50$, and a few larger ones, from what I saw. I think we should all donate to the cause. 'Apes together strong.'

"She was denied her freedom of assembly, her freedom of speech, and most importantly, her right to be free from unlawful detention." In these times in particular we should all be concerned about our rights, and the rights of others.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just looked and it's now over 185k. The goal was 30k.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Dr. Borrenpohl is gonna kick their booties, metaphorically and legally speaking. As of this morning, 7.7k donations, and $239K raised with the vast majority of donations at $100 and below. And you know the subjects of this suit are aware of this fact, they are probably watching that GFM as closely as we are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It's a good thing that N. ID cities and towns are so flush with cash these days. Umm, wait, well https://cdapress.com/news/2024/feb/06/cda-school-leaders-trustees-money-saving-measures/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What would the offense be?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't know enough about their statutes, but either way this sounds like the legislature is inviting citizens to assault other citizens so long as they think a law was broken.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

eating a meal. a succulent chinese meal.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

Unidentified? You'd think not knowing just who the hell these guys are someone would be right in kicking and punching their teeth right the fuck in, because otherwise, they are just people assaulting you and your rights.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Donated. I hope she enjoys the lawsuit settlement $ and has many more years of being a "rabble-rouser" and causing "ruckuses".

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh Cœur d’Alene. Never change.

Actually, change everything (besides the scenery). Maybe start with the white nationalists and go from there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Kid I grew up with became a sheriff in California. He moved there when he became a Trumper. We're no longer friends. He's a racist POS.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Well, I guess this is just the start

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Police chief acting like a Democratic congressperson instead of acting like someone that would shoot an 11 year old with a toy gun.