this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
124 points (100.0% liked)

News

28185 readers
4717 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We thank our shareholders for standing firm on this issue while we preemptively capitulate.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess you didn’t read the article.

"As the legal landscape around this issue evolves, we may need to make some changes to comply, but our north star of dignity and respect for everyone and our work to that end will never waver," Mr Cook said during a question-and-answer session at the company's annual shareholder meeting.

He noted that Apple did not use "quotas" for hiring - a practice that has come in for some of the fiercest criticism - while saying the firm's strength came from a culture where "people with diverse backgrounds and perspectives come together".

"We'll continue to work together to create a culture of belonging where everyone can do their best work," he added, saying the company would remain "committed to the values that have always made us who we are".

They committed to nothing but a vague concept of change to stifle the shareholders. Apple has made diversity a priority for decades. They’re not changing their values for money.

Source: worked there for 10 years

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read that part and also this one:

[Angela Jackson] said she wanted to see the company lead by making a more robust business case for the programmes. "They've made the right moves. The one step they could go further... is to really say, 'Yes it's our values, we believe it's the right thing to do, but it's also an economic imperative."

Cook’s statement about “needing to make some changes to comply”, while not indicating any immediate changes, is setting the stage for future compromise, not a principled defense of its policies.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That was after already declaring their stance on DEI and receiving pushback. It was merely a way to shut up their largest shareholder, Vanguard. The economic imperative was a way to try and convince them that it’s in the best interest of protecting the business against lawsuits to maintain the practices in place. That fell on deaf ears.

If you own even one share of Apple stock, you can live stream the shareholder meetings. It went back and forth until it was clear that Tim had to say something to move on, but as it says in the article, he committed to nothing tangible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are we talking about the same apple? Lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did you have a different experience working there? I’m a white cishet man and was the minority in my location of hundreds of employees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, you are just a cuck then?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

My opinions on working there vary from topic to topic. There were plenty of things I could be critical of, but not how they treated us as employees. Besides the great environment, there is high pay, benefits, employee stock plan, and bonus RSUs, even for entry-level employees. It’s very rare in today’s corporate culture.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry Tim, as a gay, you are actually a DEI hire. Off to Guantanamo now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Actually, the shareho-- I...mean I have decided not to be a gay anymore."

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Rainbow fash

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Tim Cook: no product vision, no actual principles.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

So many people here didnt read the article.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Do you have an example of any company using "qutoas?" I'm starting to think that's just a boggyman term at this point.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Coward, nothing but cowards. How do they ever stand up to unions??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Because they can reach out to "consultant groups" that specialize in third world mercenary actions and union busting.

To fight Trump they have to think for themselves.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From now on, only whites. I assume.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

i don't think i spotted a single poc in their latest fun little iphone 16e(?) announcement- pretty sure basically all of the previous announcements included some sort of corpo virtue signalling

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

So, guaranteed roles for conservative white men then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No more Homosexuals ?

Edit:

Someone add the punchline and spare me from down votes