Doomism sure is bad. It’s even worse than us emitting the most co2 ever last year. Stay positive folks!
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
69 points (100.0% liked)
Videos
15975 readers
219 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is disingenuous. To lower atmospheric co2 we need to actively absorb co2 out from the atmosphere while the output of co2 is lower than the absorption. So to even see a progress on this chart we need to first achieve net zero.
No, we would see an infection point on this chat if we were to make progress, even if we're not at net zero. The chart would at least be increasing at a decreasing rate, as opposed to the current trajectory increasing at a steady or even increasing rate.
Actually, since 2020 the curve looks linear rather than exponential, which does match what he says on the video that we might have stopped increasing emissions year over year. Obviously this is not enough, but it is progress.
Probably just due to covid lockdowns. Emissions have been steadily increasing since
https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions/
Oh great, instead of +4C we're on track for +3.4C
Keep doing sarcasm like that and we will see +3.4°C turn into +3.8°C.
If we suddenly decide to stop spewing record amounts of greenhouse gases then we might have a small chance... But that needs to be a quick decline which we have simply not seen.
It's not happening. We fly more planes than ever, and we send more container ships around the world than ever. Besides those, CO2 is just one greenhouse gas. Methane is another major contributor to the greenhouse effect.
Whether we prevent further warming is even kind of a moot point now. We've already got a certain
Then there's loss of ice cover, which creates a feedback loop of further absorption of sunlight (heat).
We're already living in the world created by climate change, and it's just getting started. It's clear that our built environment is not prepared for it at all. Who knew that some of the earliest climate refugees in the US would be homeowners who couldn't get insurance?
The video above gives false hope. With extreme and increasingly unpredictable weather, it's only a matter of time until we get a major crop failure. How many of those can the system absorb?
Don't forget, all the stuff in the video is being implemented basically to prolong the happy motoring lifestyle. That's awful for the environment even if it's EVs
Well fuck, might as well give up then, eh? You evidently have...
I would suggest you listen to the Nate Hagens Podcast. "What is to be done" is pretty much the topic.
The video does not give false hope. There is hope. We won't escape disaster, but we have the power to reduce the magnitude of the disaster. Giving up is what's deniers do to justify not changing anything, and is a very dangerous stance to take.
You may take some solace from the Great Simplification with Nate Hagens
He's focused on building the world that comes next
I'll take a look, thanks.
So we'll have green energy but capitalism will be as strong as ever. A solar dystopia. At least there will be a future for us to be shadowrunners in.
Just watched this video myself last night. Really good. His other video on positive tipping points is worth a watch to.