PiJiNWiNg

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

A sarcastimark, if you will

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Love the toxic avenger, hope they do it justice. Looks like Tromaville is involved, so I'm sure it'll be great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

When I had a similar issue to this I resolved it by adjusting my retraction settings, specifically retraction distance and speed. I think that may be the case here, as the layers most dramatically affected appear to be those with the most retractions taking place. Depending on the material and the style of printer you have (direct drive or Bowden) your settings will be different, but I would start by dropping the retraction distance and see how that changes things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe they'll do it like 'Troll 2' and just go right to the sequel

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

This is a conspiracy theory I can get behind

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Which is exactly why when Einstein got the Nobel Prize when he discovered the photoelectric! Kind of a big deal when basically everything before that was turbine driven, as you mention.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Well that's awesome

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wtf are people even buying? Different board pieces or something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I'm an admin not a dev, but when writing complex scripts, I found using a whiteboard essential to lay out high level workflows.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Hey, tripe doesn't deserve that

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Lol, well I'm guessing they're just taking the weight, dividing it by grams (or whatever amount its usually sold to individuals in), and multiplying that by it's "dose value". So, for easy math, if 1g of coke goes for $100, and cops bust someone with a kilo (1000g), it becomes a million dollar bust when nobody would ever actually pay that much.

 

2x Chicken Top Ramen packs Frozen corn and peas Healthy spoonfull of chili oil Dash of sesame oil 2x eggs 1x beef hotdog cheddar cheese

I usually like american cheese in my ramen, but cheddar works in a pinch.

 

Really happy with how it turned out! Decided to show it off to strangers for now as I haven't given it to him yet and i know he isn't on here. 😆. And it lights up!

 

Hey Folks, I have a bit of a conundrum that I'm hoping the hive mind can assist with.

I am in the process of learning docker to prep for my migration to Linux, but I have some questions about my filesystem structure. Currently my media files of all types live on a single file-based iSCSI LUN hosted on a QNAP which I connect to from a Windows machine. In my research to see if this would be consistent with best practice, I came to the conclusion that I should create independent NFS shares that the docker containers would connect to individually, rather than serving the files to the containers through the host and it's iSCSI connection.

This leads to my problem.

I can't seem to find any way to directly copy data from the LUN to one of my newly created NFS shares. With the volume of data I'll need to copy I'm trying to avoid as much overhead as possible, and using my Windows machine to connect to the new NFS share, then transferring the files from the iSCSI share, would be ludicrously inefficient.

As I'm able to SSH into my NAS, my first thought was to try and mount the iSCSI file locally and rsync the contents directly to the NFS share. After finding the home of the iSCSI file in the NAS filesystem, I discovered that it is not stored as a single, mountable file, but broken up into 1TB chunks. This leaves me unable to mount it, even in part, as each of the files lack an identifiable filesystem. Further, this is my largest partition, and so I don't (currently) have the space to attempt to concatenate the files into a single file (assuming that would even work, no idea).

After giving up on this approach, I decided to try and log into it's own external iSCSI target (from the NAS), then mount the LUN as I would from an external client. I thought I might be in the clear, as the login was successful, and both iscsiadm and the NAS GUI showed the active session to itself. But no matter where I looked I could see no evidence of a newly available partition, only those that were there from before I connected to the iSCSI target.

At this point the next step seems to be shrinking the partition and trying to concatenate the iSCSI files as I mentioned earlier. I have the space to play with, but I'll need to convert the volume to thin-provisioned, then shrink the volume, which would likely take foreverrrrrrr. But really, even this option sucks, because I'd prefer to avoid jeopardizing my primary storage volume in changing the provisioning style.

So anyway, after banging my head on it for the last few hours, I decided to step away and do some "rubber ducky debugging" with you guys.

So here are my questions: Is migrating to NFS worth the effort? Would the file concatenation method even work? COULD the loopback iSCSI method work if I do something differently? Any other tricks, or maybe something in the QNAP App Marketplace?

Any assistance welcome, thanks for reading!

 

I've been considering a switch to Linux for my main rig, which also runs my Plex and associated services. Does anyone have any advice for me regarding distro, tool compatibility, similar tools to consider while switching, gotcha moments, losses in key functionality, etc. Any advice appreciated!

view more: next ›