this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

59194 readers
1481 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Guys, stop using github. Put your stuff on gitlab or codeberg (clearnet or on I2P), or even put it on radicle (which can also be hosted on TOR or I2P). They'll have a much harder time taking down stuff on alternatives and it'll be nearly impossible on hidden services.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Gitlab also follows DMCA.
Codeberg is a bit different, since they aren't based in the US. However, they're still required to forward copyright complaints. I don't know of any examples of them taking down repos.

Edit: German law, which applies to Codeberg, is quite strict when it comes to what is considered circumvention of copy protection, so it's not unlikely that Nintendo would have a good chance there too. IANAL.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm gonna give them the benefit of the doubt and assume they were referring to self-hosted Gitlab.

But really anything that lessens reliance on and centralization at Github is an improvement.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're right that self hosted GitLab (or Gitea) is ideal if they host it with a privacy respecting host that allows customers to stay anonymous. And/Or proxy I2P/Tor like they mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

What about gitflic.ru? Bypass paywalls moved there after DMCA

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Radicle seems to be the most resilient darkgit ! Self-hosted gitlab, gitea or codeberg is already better than GitHub

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

Time to play whack-a-mole. And the moles are pissed.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But the main repo: https://github.com/Ryubing/Ryujinx Is still up. They write that Ryujinx circumvents their copyright, so why aren't they taking down the main repo?

Did these forks provide prodkeys?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reading the takedown it sounds like just having the decryption code itself counts as "circumvention". I feel like emulators would be a lot safer if game decryption was a separate codebase. Then the emulator would be free to develop while Nintendo plays whack a mole with tiny easily remade decryption repos that just take your key and the file and decrypt it.

Hell ryujinx could even detect that you have the decryptor installed and automatically call it when needed, or it could be bundled during packaging but separate in development like how Bluray decryption is distributed in a separately library but can be used by for eg. VLC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Reading the takedown does imply that, but why didn't the biggest repo also get nuked then? I just find it strange.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That repo doesn't, hell it mentions that you need to dump them yourself not even mentioning the possibility of other means.

Not sure about the others though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was asking if the forks that got nuked got nuked because they had keys. Although, it seems like in the note that Nintendo has an issue with the decryption code also.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like the decryption code is probably one of those keys.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why the hell would you maintain the original name when you know Nintendo is chasing forks?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

SEO. It really is not a big problem to spin up another repo with the same name. Takes time for Nintendo to create a new DMCA and people can find the emu quickly still. Figuring out which new name was chosen every 6-12 months would be harder than just making a new repo every 3 months.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder if you could search based on their latest sha prior to the fork.

Then again anything that makes it easier to find makes it an easier target for Nintendo.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hahaha, we're doing this one again? Alrighty. Nintendo is really banking on a charitability for US DMCA law that hosting services in other countries may no longer have. This is going to get harder for them very quickly I think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Stuff like this is why if you develop an emulator, that you're better off self-hosting your own git repos, and optionally hosting on Tor/I2P to completely cover your tracks for good measure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

here we go again......

Viva C*****!