this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
77 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2168 readers
125 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Updated photo to remove the name of the company so I am not even inadvertently advertising them.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why only work 9-5 when you could work 7am-7pm, 7 days a week? Clearly the 777 model is superior, because the number is bigger

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Depends on how you write out "nine to five". 9-5 is just 4 and obviously quite small, but 9^5 is even bigger and therefore more betterer than 777

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

9 days a week 25 hours a day!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Deliberately or not, this post is an advertisement.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol, I guess, but without the link to click, not a very good one.

EDIT: I blanked out the name of the company, so it's not even inadvertently an ad.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

"Be your own boss!"

Translation: "We don't want you as an employee because it's much easier to fuck you as a contractor"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

FYI the thumbnail still shows the name of the company

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you mean the letters "DA" I left that on purpose because it is hardly enough to identify the company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I guess it takes a while to propagate, its updated for me now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Depending on the details, might be worth doing just to fuck with the input. But it might not be