this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
163 points (100.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

5763 readers
151 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As President Trump imposes tariffs on products from countries around the world, foreign governments are answering back with tariffs of their own.

China has targeted corn farmers and carmakers. Canada has put tariffs on poultry plants and air-conditioning manufacturers, while Europe will hit American steel mills and slaughter houses.

The retaliatory tariffs are an attempt to put pressure on the president to relent. And they have been carefully designed to hit Mr. Trump where it hurts: Nearly 8 million Americans work in industries targeted by the levies and the majority are Trump voters, a New York Times analysis shows.

The figures underscore the dramatic impact that a trade war could have on American workers, potentially causing Mr. Trump’s economic strategy to backfire. Mr. Trump has argued that tariffs will help boost American jobs. But economists say that retaliatory tariffs can cancel out that effect.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago

Some areas will be hit with a double whammy: Unemployed due to Trump playing tariff roulette, and then no social security.

One has to give it to Canada, China, and the EU: They know where it hurts.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (2 children)

title butchers any meaning the article is attempting to convey

crab mentality is strong in the United States here of late with voters blaming each other for the destruction of the country when the ones that truly fund and run the country are the perpetrators that have Trump on a leash doing their bidding

only way out when civil disobedience, protests, and voting do not work is for us serfs to revolt

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 16 points 6 days ago

We must assuredly 'all hang together', or assuredly we shall all hang separately.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're correct. This is idiotic to think that un-tariffed spots will be left alone. Sorry, gang. We're all paying for this idiocy.

Indeed, although I will concede, that the tariffs are designed to hit some areas more directly, and others more indirectly. But this will impact the economy as a whole, with financial capital most likely in the best position to gain (by potentially buying up assets from other sectors for cheap when they fail).

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

It hurts itself in its confusion

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

While the measures are targeted at the right locations, everyone will be affected. Poultry in the unaffected areas will still be as expensive as in the targeted locations. Car prices will go up nationally. Lumber will go up everywhere.

Good job, Trumpers. You did it. You managed to own the Libs. Hope it was worth it.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

Yes, but so long as the south burns hottest, I am more than willing to accept a tan.

This has been overdue since reconstruction ended early.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Democrat support for CR to keep government open, included Congress forbidding itself from its power to 2nd guess "national emergencies" or trade actions. So, maybe all Americans are supportive of getting faces eaten.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

That's a lot of words to say "I don't understand two party systems"

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Isn't it just pretty much this map

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago

That matches the hue, but the added dimension is the saturation. Counties in brighter colors are more impacted by retaliatory tariffs, while duller colors are less impacted. The point is to illustrate that a higher proportion of impacted counties voted for Trump than if the impact were spread evenly, though the effect is not that pronounced. Statistically, people working in different industries tend to vote one direction or the other compared to average, but there are still both Harris and Trump voters in every industry.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Good. Let the magats starve.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago

I don't care if they put 1000% tariffs on popcorn, watching this is worth any price.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Loyal MAGAtards will fully believe it only hurts this much because Biden did such horrible damage, which their Lord and Savior is now trying to repair. "Thank God we got Trump back before it was too late!"

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago

Interesting.

Fuck nyt

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Sure, rural areas with fewer employers and less diverse economies will have trouble adapting, but at least all the programs that help people through hard times are getting defunded and shut down.