this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
534 points (100.0% liked)

Trippin' Through Time

3705 readers
442 users here now

A lemmy replacement for the r/trippinthroughtime sub.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Tattoo artist: where do you want it?

Me: cracks ribcage open Fuck me up fam.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

In fairness, lots of Protestant churches have very plain furnishings as a direct reaction to this kind of opulence. Personally I'm torn. Cathedrals are beautiful to visit, but I don't think I could ever actually attend somewhere that imposing without being constantly distracted by it. Now some Evangelicals have gone full-circle with megachurches that are even worse...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's odd to me. I don't think I could find as much divinity in a plain temple. Striking and overwhelming beauty inspire divinity in me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I respect that. After all, different denominations are still relevant for a reason :). And there is Biblical precedent for a fancy building (Solomon's Temple).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, what we really need are some good ziggurats

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Don’t forget that the very idea of such extravagance is pretty antithetical to the bible AND they used funds that could have actually helped people in order to do it. Surface beauty like that is too dishonest for me to find beautiful; the best I can manage is a “neat, but I wish they hadn’t”.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

It made sense centuries ago. Imagine living a simple peasant life being a dirt farmer or whatever, then entering a building full of stained glass, precious metals, and/or tile mosaics that glow in the sunlight. It would make you feel like you'd entered a divine realm. I mean, it still can, but we get pretty calloused to that stuff after being immersed in modern technology.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Now some Evangelicals have gone full-circle with megachurches that are even worse…

A crucifix plated in gold and stained glass windows? wipes brow No, this sort of op-yulence will not do for mah church.

Only a wooden cross is what we need. Build it 100 feet tall so that it can fill up this entire AUDITORIUM um um um...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

“My body is a Lutheran church” doesn’t quite have the same ring to it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Lutheran church of Sibiu, Romania :-)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

"My body is a quaker meeting house. All friends are welcome inside"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

My body is a temple, everyone is welcome to worship (in) it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anymore it's like: Tattoos? No thanks, I'm not a dad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I just don't care about anything enough to have it permanently inscribed on my body.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Those images are easy removable. Tattoos are not. That's the difference :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Slapping down a coat of paint on top isn’t removal, it’s a coverup. And it’s probably not as easy as you’re imagining.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Removal is removal. I don't talk about covering up. I talk about removal. And I don't talk about cheese. I talk about pictures, frescos, etc. No, taxes aren't the topic I discuss. Removal is what I am talking about. Removal results in removing something, not adding and that is why I say removal while talking about removal of removable things during the removal process of removing removable things. Not adding, mind you, but removal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You're a fucking weirdo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sorry for assuming you were a normal person. I hope that weird pedantic rant made you feel good, because it certainly didn’t do you any favors otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

What did you expect by not willing to read the context? Nobody talked here about "covering up". You just pulled it out out of nowhere and start arguing with that. It is not how "normal persons" behave. Go to ignore, normal person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The difference is one is controlled by those that want to control those with the latter through guilt, shame, and fear.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Are we still talking about pictures?