A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
but skepticism remains over Russia’s commitment to peace.
There might be some skepticism, yes…
Putin agreed to halt attacks on energy infrastructure
damaging homes and injuring civilians
They technically didnt violate the terms i guess, but this is not what was intended i believe.
they specifically did target energy infrastructure so yes, they did https://kyivindependent.com/zelensky-trump-to-hold-a-conversation-on-march-19/
I mean they didnt write that in the article from this post that was published 3 hours ago. I assumed it would be up to date, so thanks for the correction. I guess the guardian is just outdated or intentionally misleading then.
technically it was also not a "violation of ceasefire" because putin said any ceasefire can only happen only after all western military aid and intelligence sharing are stopped. all, not just american. clown shit
I think there is talk of Russia striking energy infrastructure?
apparently wrong, see other comments
Nah it says this in the article:
A Kremlin statement said Putin had issued an order to the Russian military to suspend strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure.
I know they arent trustworthy, but if Russia had violated the terms, then the headline would read
Russia violates terms hours after partial ceasefire...
and not
Russia attacks...
"Peace"
Skepticism rises as to whether the aggressor who could have peace by leaving the invaded country alone actually wants peace. It’s a total mystery.
theres no world where trump and/or putin is in power where there is peace for a sovereign ukraine.
they have to go.
Trump praised the call as “productive,” while Zelensky awaited U.S. clarification before responding.
Look what they did to my boy.
Geez, Israel just wipes their ass with cease fire agreements, Russia just wipes their ass with cease fires...
They must have something in common
Putin has now reached a level of Skaven where's making ceasefire deals just so he can break. There hasn't been enough betrayal for his liking yet, so he must manufacture some. Unhinged behavior.