this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
290 points (100.0% liked)

News

27571 readers
4965 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The move follows a meeting between Trump and Brad Karp, the chairman of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Garrison & Wharton, over the White House order issued last week.

The order, the latest in a series of similar actions targeting law firms whose lawyers have provided legal work that Trump disagrees with, threatened to suspend active security clearances of attorneys at Paul, Weiss and to terminate any federal contracts the firm has. It singled out the work of Mark Pomerantz, who previously worked at the firm and who oversaw an investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office into Trump’s finances before Trump became president.

To avoid those consequences, the White House said Paul, Weiss had agreed to “take on a wide range of pro bono matters that represent the full spectrum of political viewpoints of our society,” to disavow the use of diversity, equity and inclusion considerations in its hiring and promotion decisions and to dedicate the equivalent of $40 million in free legal services to support Trump administration policies on issues including assistance for veterans and countering anti-Semitism.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 28 minutes ago

He made an offer they couldn't refuse...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago

Time to "oops I lost the case because I missed a filing deadline" all those pro bono nazi cases they just promised

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

...after law firm bent the knee and pledged to advance White Supremacy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 hours ago

Breathtakingly cheery headline there, Associated Press.

[–] [email protected] 124 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Jesus. They had to promise to promote white supremacism and defend fascists, or the new Nazi regime would have crushed them out of existence for their impermissible assistance to democratic forces. And we all know that "countering antisemitism" would be great if it meant what it says, but it doesn't mean what it says.

Also, there goes AP again with the blandest headline ever for a shocking story.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

the law firm is finished the moment they support trump and when his presidency ends, no clients will trust them anymore.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago

Nah there are always rich oligarchs looking for lawyers, no shortage of clients even in peacetime.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

Maybe they'll do what Trump does. Just agree to it and then don't do it.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 12 hours ago

With a huge side helping of mafia style blackmail. They stopped hiding it a long time ago.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Extortion, corruption, and wielding the government against his enemies.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 hours ago

"Yeah, gee, it'd be a real shame if someone came in and messed up your nice place of business here. But you know what? We can protect you from those sorts of lowlifes. We sell, you could say, a type of insurance to protect you against that happening."

[–] [email protected] 65 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Does everyone roll over for this guy? No one has a backbone?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not any people with money. You don't get rich by having principles.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

And a law firm depending on federal contracts doesn't make much when the President singles you out and threatens to end you. I mean sure, you could try and fight it in court, but if he rigs the judiciary against you your outcome isn't promising.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

How much do you want to get exported to a south american labour camp ?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It's OK, this is what the majority of American voters chose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

voted in by a plurality, not quite 50% +1 —still means GOP won the big enchilada in 2024