World News

The US side is bleak industrial wasteland.

*to be fair, the Canadian side that isn't Clifton Hill is a bleak residential wasteland.

If you stay in the international terminal, I'm sure you'll be fine.

Statistically, how many thousands of people enter the US every day, versus how many of these incidents have happened? Odds are you'll be totally fine. The risk is higher, yes.

I'm afraid it's going to be a lot longer than 4 years.

I don't know anyone in Canada still planning trips to the USA. My cousin spends 2-3 months out of the year in California. She's been doing it for 10 years now. She had cancelled all those plans going forward.

There is even more of a risk for Canadians to go to the US. It's always been dangerous in the US with the insane amount of guns in the average idiots hands, but now we've got Ice Bros itching to hurt people as well. Fuck that noise.

The US really doesn't offer us anything we can't get from another safer country.

If you think about it, these are government announcements, it's just over two months since the excrement started hitting the rotating equipment.

In that time a country needs to take note of the change in circumstances to its citizens, verify that it's happening systemically and not occasionally, formulate a response, approve the response, and then publish it.

Much of the border issues didn't appear to be visible until a month or so ago.

In other words, I think that this is lightening fast as diplomatic responses go.

Those are rookie numbers. We haven’t even gone full fascism.

I know in the case of the UK it only happened after a UK citizen was detained, I think Germany might be the same as well

I've updated it a couple of times, it's getting longer.

Many of the rest already knew.

US allies? I don't see Russia on the list.

It appears that Germany has updated their information several times. So much so that your second link gives me a 404 error. There are multiple reports stating that Germany issued a travel warning. The most recent I could find is from three days ago: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/foreign-travel-warnings-about-us-travel.html

There are updates that are older than this that state that Germany changed its report and clarified that they weren't issuing a travel warning specifically, just heightened caution. That seems like "some form of warning" to me.

Australia has similar wording. While it describes the situation as "Green", it talks about heightened levels of alert and crime.

This is precisely why I worded my post: "It appears that these countries now have some form of warning associated with travelling to the USA:" (emphasis added).

I think that the wording that Germany is using falls under this heading.

Source?

Edit: found it https://www.newsweek.com/norway-issues-travel-warning-us-2051890

On one hand, it is a lot of revenue lost. On the other, it's also a lot of resources freed up for Americans that would otherwise have been used by foreign tourists. As long as the supply remains the same and the demand drops, prices should get reduced as well. That's what people understand.

What they don't understand is that companies expect this to be temporary, and they'd rather have losses they can write off, rather than smaller profits that their investors will be upset about.

To his point, an unstable economyis also what they voted for. Some might have been too stupid to comprehend their actions, but it is exacy what they chose.