this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
255 points (100.0% liked)

Historical Artifacts

1149 readers
65 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

She never skip leg day

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

The original thunder thighs

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dunno. I don't think they'd have time for that while kung-fu fighting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's possible that they were fighting because of something someone did earlier. It may (or may not) have had anything to do with being horny. I'm just open to the possibility that the one lead to the other, even if there's no archeological or lyrical record of it. Sometimes you find this stuff in the subtext.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And now, so am I.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Back when I studied Anthropology in college, they would always talk about statuettes like these being evidence of a "cult of fertility". Years later I realized that's just fancy academia language for "porn".

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for the link. I genuinely thought it was too good to be from that era. And the expression on her face has a kind of attitude. Even in kids toys in my lifetime, I've only seen than in more recent figures as opposed to the 80's when I was growing up. Back then they were expressionless, even for figures from toys from well known franchises.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

A question of artisan work vs. mass-produced goods, I think!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

"Adolescent girl" ah that explains why her boobs look like mine

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Dummy thicc

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Identifies as thick.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I'm digging the thickness...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Thick ancles, good for pulling plow.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did they not wear tops? My knowledge is limited to road to Eldorado.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just imagine how they would have drawn her if it wasn't a kids movie.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Ive never seen the film so I looked up that character, that shit is thirsty as fuck

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, they already basically showed her giving sloppy head sooooo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

my point exactly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Re-watch time!

[–] AsslessChaps 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can’t believe you assumed their gender

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

They look just like my manmaries!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The 1,000 year gap really shows how fast things move now. Imagine not being able to date if something was made 1,000 years ago or today. Even a couple decades is a big change in what we use.