this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
211 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9672 readers
778 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Everyone needs to VOTE. End of story.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I maintain it should be required by law to vote, punishable by expatriation. If one doesn't want to do the one thing required of them in a democracy, they can gtfo and live in an undemocratic country.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Expatriation is a bit extreme, especially when we don't even have a voting holiday. I agree with a strong incentive though, perhaps a 1-3% tax rebate?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Nope. I am serious. We have to literally do one thing as citizens and that is vote. If one isn't willing to do that one doesn't get the benefits of a democracy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You aren't serious. How tf are you going to "expatriate" someone? Put them in a rowboat and tow them into international waters?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You act like I have the power to do anything at all. Chill out. I don't care how it would be done I think that's how it should be because it is that easy and important to vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I could see this if every opportunity was made to allow it.

Loosing citizenship due to a debilitating illness is completely unacceptable for example.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is weird how humans immediately try to find exceptions to a rule without ever discussing its full implementation in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's full implementation is unacceptable as a hard rule. I agree with doing a lot to ensure everyone votes, but removing rights for reasons beyond one's control is the opposite of helpful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one said rights would be removed for reasons beyond control. Quit being ridiculous, shit isn't real.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Expatriation means losing basically every right in the charter, and is politically equivalent to execution. This reason (failing to vote) is also heavily biased towards people with less control over their lives, and disrupting someone from voting could be used as a weapon.

I can see punishments for failing to vote, but such an extreme response should be reserved for those who explicitly choose not to vote, and such a system would need a rigorous judgment to act on.

Having such a thin line between citizenship and expatriation is too dangerous. On one hand, choosing not to vote may be considered a serious enough act, but on the other hand there are dozens of reasons a vote can fail to be cast, and they would all need to be addressed before something as serious as expatriation is considered as a punishment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I suspect that, when certain election methods are used, it's possible to make your preferred candidate lose if you express support for them:

instant-runoff voting is also sometimes vulnerable to a paradoxical strategy of ranking a candidate higher to make them lose, due to instant-runoff voting failing the monotonicity criterion.

I can imagine that someone's best choice can be to entirely abstain from voting in some situations. I don't think it's ethical to force people to vote if doing so would harm them.

Making a law about an obligation to vote will probably make future electoral reform harder (since people will have to figure out / get confused about whether a change will make it more likely for them to land in court), and making it hard to change bad systems is surely a bad thing.

Incentivizing someone to show up and just cast a blank ballot could make it harder to detect fraud. For example, it might be convenient to dispose of ballots that someone intended to misuse by mixing them in with the legitimate ballots, and having more blank ballots that are actually legitimate would make it less clear whether something illegal has happened.

"Voting in all federal elections in Australia is a legal obligation for citizens aged 18 and over", but there isn't a very steep penalty for not doing so (and you might even get your name published in a newspaper, which some people might value for its own sake):

Failure to vote in the federal election initially results in a $20 fine as per section 245 of the Act, which can grow if left unpaid to a $220 fine and court fees.

Having early voting and making the "main" voting day be a holiday for a large number of people seems like a good idea, since that makes voting easier for people who want to vote. Hounding people who don't want to vote (regardless of their reasoning) seems like a worse idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It is literally the only responsibility one has for all the rights and freedoms one enjoys in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

The blank ballot can be easily remedied by allowing the spoiling of ballots, or marking the vote in a way that doesn't indicate any choice.

I think this is a reasonable and valuable method of expressing political opinion, especially as this form can be counted. It also ensures that it was a deliberate choice and not just apathy.

Along the same path as incentivising people to vote, perhaps it should be cities/voting areas that get punished somehow for low voter turnout.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

No they don't. I probably won't vote this year. I'm in Leduc-Wetaskwin tell my why my vote matters? At least when the vote subsidy was around I could vote and know something happened because of it. Now I am caring less and less each election.

The next election that matters for me is provincial as the ANDP has a chance.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool, your apathy is what will ruin this country regardless of your circumstances and context

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Nope FTTP is what well ruin the country. The conservative are predicted to win in my riding by 99% NDP and Liberal have a less then 1% each of winning. You can call me apathetic all you want but my vote literally well not matter this election at all it is less then a fart in the wind.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago

I lived in Calgary, in Harper's riding while that slime was in power. I don't, and didn't, give a wet slap if I was the ONLY green booger on his otherwise blue quilt, my vote was my way to tell him, every time I could, that we weren't all in his corner. So, damn straight I voted, every goddamn time I could and you should too.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

I’m in a riding that has been staunch CPC for a very long time, however, each election, a bunch of us get out and vote, and now this is the first time that a different candidate may win. Why? Because this time, enough people polled that way that the numbers show there may be a chance. And as a result, advance voting numbers have been through the roof.

The only way there’s ever going to be a chance in your riding is if enough people get out there to make a statement in the previous election.

Make this your β€œprevious election.” We can work on eradicating FTTP in parallel.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure there are a lot of other people who are thinking the same thing. This is why progression takes so long.

If you and the others like you vote, you may not change anything, true. However, you may increase the numbers enough to turn the tide in the next election. All votes matter. It'd be interesting to see the results if the 40% of Canadians who didn't vote last election do this time, or did last time.

There are people who strive to make you believe your vote doesn't matter. Sounds like they were successful.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Oh you are right, but vote anyway otherwise they have already won by disenfranchising you from caring. This is how Trump won by a third of the populartion not bothering to try.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

I'm in an Alberta riding which is very likely to go CPC, but exercising my right to vote is also my civic duty.

So while it might not affect the outcome this time, my vote contributes to popular vote metrics, turnout, and in the case where there's lots people who happen to surprise (it is within the margin of error), my vote might in fact be the deciding vote that sways a riding.

It's a shame when people value democracy so little they can't be bothered to vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

You lazy fucker

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you doing here then? If you don't care enough to take an hour to go vote then you shouldn't be spending any time discussing politics. If voting doesn't matter, then discussing politics on lemmy definitely doesn't matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I still vote for NDP in my riding even though it's a Liberal stronghold. Not voting would amount to giving up, and we can't just give up no matter the odds.

My vote tells the NDP and their candidate that there are people out there caring for their platform.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean? The subsidy is still there. Every vote is 2$ to the party you vote for. For example, I know in my riding that the liberals are certain to win. So I voted NDP so they can have my 2$ at least.

Go vote!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Only sane response

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm so disappointed in our country at this point. 4 years of conservative government across North america- good luck everyone who doesn't vote for PP

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not really clear where your position is, but I will make my position clear: We all see where right wing populism ends up just by looking south of us. It's a disaster. Copying that in this moment is outright idiocy. Picking the right wing populist who has never been on the right side of an issue and who mimics the exact policy beats of the Republicans is a surefire way to go down the same path. We need to tell the Conservatives to drop their culture war crazies, stop fighting against experts, stop trying to remove rights from people, and focus on real solutions to real problems.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Canadians conservatives are left of the Democrats. Canada is far less right leaning.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Are you assuming I'm ok with Democrats?

Can you name me one policy that is left of Democrats? I can name quite a few that are not - obsession with woke nonsense and culture war bullshit, disdain for the media, anti-intellectualism, climate change, disdain for government, dismantling the public service - without even getting into right to abortion, which is where a not insignificant proportion of the party wants to go, as evidenced by the thinly veiled and thankfully ham fisted attempts to push through bills to undermine it.

It's hard for Poilievre to distance himself from Trump when he borrows Trump politics. I mean, really, if you're trying to sound less like Trump, maybe don't bring up plastic straws. That's really the most important issue? I thought Poilievre had some political instincts, so I thought he would wisely avoid dumb statements like that...but I think now he wants to look like Trump because a) is all he knows and he clearly cannot pivot, and b) he calculates that his base doesn't care, and it seems he's right..which makes him and them profoundly unaware of the new reality, and profoundly unprepared for what we must do to meet it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

For now. Conservatives have been inching further right for decades and if the US is any indication, they're gonna start speeding up. Especially if they win this one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Very strong collaborator vibes from this one.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

While I don't enjoy seeing our politics being reduced to a two party system, given the lack of proportional representation this seems like an obvious decision for the NDP voters and even the party itself. Better a liberal than Conservative when they're clearly not going to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

U guys want trump? No? Go vote then.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

@Sunshine, I like the idea of engaging fellow voters by surfacing interesting ridings. We should do more of that. Highlight close races, and who's the main contenders. Might get some people in those ridings informed and others motivated to get out and vote.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

All one can do is hope for anything but another liberal government.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you prefer to have PP to notwithstanding your rights away?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Conservative logic demands perfection from all other parties except their own, in which case, anything goes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

looks like 170 bless could make the difference

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί