this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
102 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9568 readers
1041 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pierre Poilievre speaks with conviction. “We are Conservatives,” he says. “We don’t believe in big fat government programs. We don’t believe in giving money.”

At first, that might sound like ordinary political talk. But these words are more than slogans. They are signals. They draw lines between who is deserving of support, and who is not. Between who counts, and who is left behind.

This is not about fiscal restraint. It’s about stripping away the systems that many of us rely on to survive and thrive. It’s about making life harder for people navigating poverty, housing precarity, chronic illness, disability, single parenthood, systemic racism, colonial legacies, gender-based violence. And then telling them it’s their fault.

Poilievre received a government pension at the age of 31. Later, he tried to target other MPs over their pensions in a public stunt. The reality? His own pension is roughly three times larger, projected to be around $230,000 annually by the time he turns 65. That number will only grow if he becomes Prime Minister. Soon after securing his pension, he voted to raise the retirement age for others to 67. He speaks of independence and “the value of hard work,” but only applies those values to communities who’ve been denied fair access to opportunities for generations. In 2008, he questioned whether survivors of residential schools should receive compensation, arguing instead that Indigenous peoples just need to “work harder.” In 2023, he addressed a group that claimed the harms of residential schools were a “myth.”

This is not just a political position. It’s an erasure of truth. It’s a refusal to reckon with Canada’s history and its ongoing impacts.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

A vote for pp is the same as voting for galen westin/loblaws to run the country.

It will be privatized, and you will pay them for services you already pay for in taxes.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pierre will cut a lot of programs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Which Canadians cannot afford. Because we are poorer than the poorest US state, and our productivity investment is at alarm levels according to our own BoC.

This is the tradgedy of the commons right here, we had a lost decade of per capita GDP growth, lowest in the OECD; but the average person wants to continue running up debt to "help" all those people who are now suffering. Most of our problems seem to be own goals, from housing to stagnant wages, as we pushed mass immigration to artificially boost GDP to hide our poor economic record, and we wonder why we now have doctor shortages.

For those that are stuck with these lunatics that want 4 more years of this, just invest in XAW.TO to stay afloat. Its low fee and globally diverse minus Canada. Though if they become a green energy superpower, by shipping their intermittent wind and solar power to the US, you'll miss out on all those gains /s.