this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4187 readers
202 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and a sexual craving for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The kriss has a really interesting internal mechanism. Worth a glance if you're into guns. I got to try it once and nothing feels like it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Doesn't it have some kind of counter balance system so it recoils downward? Or do I have that backwards? I saw something about it years ago and it was indeed interesting.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah the recoil goes down at a ~45° angle so you get weirdly little muzzle rise. It was uncanny.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm assuming you only got to fire it semi-auto. I've heard the two round burst on non-civilian models is extremely uncanny feeling.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

2rb actually, at a place in Las Vegas. The guy next to me was literally firing a mini-gun.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Ooh nice. Of course it was in Las Vegas lmao. That seems very on-brand for minigunning.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

they're good dogs bront

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I would very much like to see someone try to fire the Bullpup SVT.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I don't hate it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So from a mechanics standpoint what are the pros/cons of a bullpup design? off the top of my head I'm guessing more barrel length but less space for any kind of recoil supression?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Pros: Longer barrel in the same overall size, or a shorter total length for the same barrel. A longer barrel means more exit velocity, while a shorter weapon means more agility in small spaces (indoors, for example).

Cons: the ejection port is close to the shooter's face, making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible. The chamber is also closer, making it more dangerous in the (relatively rare) case of a catastrophic failure.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

B-but the FN P90 is ambidextrous and ejects the casings downwards.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The FN P90 is weird no matter how you look at it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

It's safer to look at it from the rear I believe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hard to scale that particular design up to longer cartridges, unfortunately. A 5.56 P90 would be so cool, though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Keltec RDB has bottom eject and fires 5.56

Ckr even more noncredibility, the Keltec RFB is a bullpup with forward eject.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two projectiles for the price of one?! Count me in.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Borderlands ass gun lmao

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Keltec just can't stop making cool shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is how the RDB rendered on my mobile browser:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

we need wide zelensky with stout rdb rofl

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Cons

Also generally a more complex mechanism, with the associated negative effects on reliability, cost, or both

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Also weird ergonomic issues and a different manual of arms. Those can both be trained around, but that's a big ask for most militaries.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible

Kel-tec calls bullshit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Hot brass bukkake is the price you have to pay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible

Angry FAMAS noises
well, it's not strictly ambidextrous but it's allegedly pretty easy to change the side of the ejection

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the ejection port is close to the shooter's face, making ambidextrous weapons nearly impossible

Keltec RDB

Keltec RFB

Springfield Hellion

DesertTech WLVRN

... I probably missed some, but there are many bullpup rifles that are swappable between left sided and right sided ejection ports, and swappable mag release, charging handle, bolt catch, safety selectors... or have some other solution to this problem.

Not exactly nearly impossible.

I would add in as a detriment of bullpups... that their internals are generally more complex, and properly identifying the cause of a failure to fire, and fixing it, while under stress, is often more difficult, and general maintenance tends toward being more time consuming as well.

Also: generally notorious for requiring a lot more foot lbs of force to pull the trigger, and that trigger pull is 'crunchier'.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Hinterschaftlader

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Bullpupperest AUG.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Is there a Bullpuppy? Does it want cuddles?