this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
449 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24356 readers
3572 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Remember gang, articles require conservatives to flip in the house and senate, and his poll numbers are still high with the Republican bases of those house and senate folks.

This will make noise, which is nice, but it’s not going anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 month ago

I like it a whole lot more than the Dems standing around with their thumbs up their asses. It probably won't go anywhere, but at least make some fucking noise.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Assuming all democrats in the House vote to impeach, it will take 4 republicans joining them to reach the 50% threshold to succeed. That could honestly be doable. The Senate is another story. It would take 20 republicans to vote with all the democrats and independents to reach the 67% needed to convict. Not impossible, but a profoundly uphill battle.

Call your reps, protest, make noise. As long as the republicans think that Trump's hordes will keep them in office for supporting him, they won't cave. If we can convince them that the MAGA loons will not be enough to get them reelected and keep their cushy jobs, they'll flip. They are not loyal to Trump, they are afraid of him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The problem is, in what way would all the senators be threatened if they don’t vote against?

Because I guarantee that trump’s administration has dirt on every single one of them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just like the last 2 times.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, the last two times the Dems controlled the house. So this won’t even get off the ground.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's possible for it to make it through the house, but the Senate definitely won't remove him.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to have hope. I sincerely do.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, Republicans all completely fell in line with Trump after Elon said he'd primary anyone who didn't

Then, Elon outspent the other candidate in the Wyoming supreme court election like 10:1 and still lost. There's talk his involvement hurt more than helped. The very next day Trump said Elon has to go back to his businesses soon

No member of Congress can go out in public without being screamed at to do something. Historically conservative districts are flipping in special elections. Musk's money is useless, Trump's endorsement means less by the day, and even the oligarchs are getting nervous about Trump

Very few politicians are actually loyal to Trump, most are in it for themselves. There's reason for some hope... The pressure is already high. Imagine how bad it'll be in a few weeks, when people start seeing supply chain shortages on the shelves...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Wisconsin Supreme Court. Nobody actually lives in Wyoming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Elon said he'd primary anyone who didn't

That sort of infighting would lead to a blue blowout in the midterms so bring it on

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not gonna go anywhere, but it's good to get their effort on record. Republicans can own the shitshow.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That's exactly how I feel. Years from now, the articles of impeachment will exist, along with the Republicans inactivity. Not that it will mean anything if we are all dead, but at least there was an attempt.

I don't know if this will be useful if we ever have Nuremberg-type trials, showing republicans were negligent?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Again? We all know this is pointless, grand standing. They would have to get enough republicans on board, and that just isn't going to happen. It is pretty fully the party of Trump now.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The public:

Democrats, do something!

Democrats, doing something.

The public:

This is just pointless grandstanding!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This isn't doing something. This is just signaling. They know along with everyone else that it will fail. This is pretending to do something in order to seem like you're doing something.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What specifically would you like them to do?

Not saying you're wrong, but curious here.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Don’t keep voting to approve his nominees, for one. Put a hold on each and every one of them. Vote against all of the laws the republicans are putting through congress. Filibuster everything. Basically, act like the republicans have since 1992.

They could start with that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of that still won't do anything because they don't have the numbers (like articles of impeachment). The house needs 4 Republicans to go against the pack to hit 50%.

I'm not saying it's not worth doing, but FlexibleToast was saying that all of that is posturing and won't accomplish anything.

The answer is that Democrats can't directly do anything, which was what the person you responded to was alluding to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I don't even think it's posturing. I fully expect that not even every democrat would vote for this impeachment. With Maga Mike Johnson as the leader, it won't even make it to the floor. It's less than posturing. It's pointless, and it's just to grab the headline like this. An impeachment of a president has historically resulted in exactly 0 convictions. Trump brags about being vilified, it's just feeding into his narrative.

Their efforts would be far better spent finding better candidates and embracing progressive ideas that would actually win. Go canvas for what those policies are and figure out your messaging. Figure out how to win and take some power back instead of these powerless moves. If they keep just attacking Trump, they'll just keep entrenching the people that voted for him. It will validate the voters' belief that the democrats don't have their own path forward that will better their lives.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

And what legal alternatives do they have? Or what are you suggesting Democrats in the Senate / House do?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dunno, there is still hope that some of the lesser republicans can’t afford Trump and are willing to sell out for a better market. I’m not holding my breath either haha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm hoping the defense contractors who are losing billions in cancelled contracts will take care of the problem. Or maybe the cartels.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There’s a big list of people. Don’t fuck with the money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Democrats in office can't do shit. There are not enough of them. Democrats cannot filibuster the president's appointments because they themselves removed the filibuster rule on appointments below the level of the Supreme Court back in 2013. They could use the filibuster on some bills, but you'd have to get all of the dems to vote in lock-step like the republicans do. Good luck with that considering how many democrats are only democrats in name so they could get elected in their districts and then they vote with the republicans more often than not.

If you want change, you need to convince the republicans in office that they are going to lose their jobs. They do not support Trump because they necessarily agree with him, they do it because, as Murkowski has publicly admitted, they are afraid of him. We voters need to rally, make noise, and make them afraid of us. There are not enough MAGA voters to keep the republicans in office if enough of the rest of us actually show up to vote. We voters need to convince them that they will be out of their cushy jobs if they don't stop this lunatic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why they need to be thinking long-term, not reactionary. They need to be looking inward and ousting the ghouls in their leadership. Find actual progressive issues that the majority of people want. Focus on winning the midterms and taking away the majority from the republicans.

Instead, it sounds like they've learned nothing. They refuse to look inward and want to appeal to their big donors. Continuing to embrace the same moderate policies that lost the presidency, the house, and the senate. They refuse to acknowledge the big tent item that binds the majority of us. The owner class is fucking over the labor class.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can't imagine putting myself into a situation where I had to fear someone as ineffectual as Trump.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

His slathering hordes are something to be reasonably afraid of. Also, he did nearly manage to overthrow our government and did manage to get himself reelected four years later. He may be more effective that you think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

He's not ineffectual at being a cult leader with a rabid following, and he controls the DoJ

They're not scared of Trump personally doing anything to them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Bring it! Horribly overdue!