this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
397 points (100.0% liked)

Games

38452 readers
1578 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Also the right thing to do was not lying to your audience on purpose...fk CDPR's ceo ...

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

But.... the physical copy of CP2077 on launch for PC was just a box with some merch telling us to go download it from GOG.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago

to be fair you then put that installer on an usb and it's physical. I'd rather a DRM free digital game in a box than the code with DRM

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean... Cyberpunk needs to be on a physical card. Otherwise how would you slot it into your neck?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, releasing something physical means it has to be done. Remember what state Cyberpunk 2077 was in on release?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Hey, it's been awhile, it's gotta be done by now!

Did they finally add all the features they advertised?

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They used the No Man's Sky strategy: release trash, polish it a bit, then get praised for improving while the game is still nowhere near what was promised.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They arguably did worse, because NMS didn't just polish the game, they retroactively added most of the content + didn't release a paid DLC. Cyberpunk falls short of what has been promised to this day.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's why I'll never get it unless obtained for the good ol' price of free. I'm glad people are enjoying it and it's much improved over the trash pile they delivered! But it's still a very different game than advertised.

Frankly, it's concerning how quickly the narrative shifted on this. You'd think with the internet recording the whole fiasco, there wouldn't be a quick narrative shift and misinformation on the subject, but people have convinced themselves the launch wasn't that bad, Sony somehow screwed them and this is what they said the game would be!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One's mileage could vary wildly at launch with that game. It did work just fine for me, with some minimal jank, but I could clearly see the video evidence others had of their bad time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Oh absolutely. I know it wasn't super janky for everyone - but the fact is that it was so broken on launch for not just PC, but PS as well. The mass refunds, which Sony has never done, etc. Denying that this was a thing is what the narrative seems to be for many.

I'm glad it worked for you on launch, and hope you had a great time playing it!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

I agree, but nms probably did it better

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Battlefield 2042 tried that and still seems to be widely hated. I like it, it was on sale recently and would've been a good buy for $7 bucks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That game also happens to have some of the worst enemy AI I've ever seen in any game ever

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Uhh, it's mostly a PvP game, there's only ever AI when a round isn't full.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

You're right! I mixed it up with a different battlefield. I was thinking of the campaign mode for BFV

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I've just started playing it for the first time, seems to run fine on my steam deck.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No... They built on what they managed to make instead. Frankly, a more manageable solution

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Ah the ol'bait'n'switch, a classic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I must admit based on how well that game runs on an incredibly expensive desktop computer I am skeptical.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Digital for things you consume. Physical for things you love.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pirated for things you consume, legit for things you love

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Fanfics for things you really really love

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or at least a drm free installer.

I guess I’ll stock up on gog installers for games I own on Steam if Steam ever becomes the villain.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would encourage you to support GoG before you have to rely on them, otherwise if everyone does like you they may not be able to sustain their business.

It's a bit akin to waiting for a crash before putting your seatbelt on.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

If GOG benefitted Linux users as much as steam does then Yea, I'd be throwing cash at them every payday. I love GOG and what they do, but I also need to show support for what valve is doing for Linux too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

And here’s an opinion by a game publisher NOT invested in getting haggled by a monopolist.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Virtue signaling isn’t going to get them anywhere if it’s not a polished experience.

Edit: Not saying it isn’t a polished experience though. I’m watching this with interest.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I cannot wait to see the performance on basically a cell phone processor…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is there something wrong with cellphone processors?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are not very powerful, and cyberpunk is a pretty beefy game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mine is very very powerful at least. But it depends on what you compare to I guess. As for cyberpunk, isn't it more gpu intensive?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

My cellphone’s hardware is some of the strongest on the market, but I can’t imagine it would run Cyberpunk anywhere near playable hahaha

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don't get why they don't just have like, install cards with cheaper but slower storage on them for smaller game devs or extra large games that require installation to the system first before it can run. Seems like the in-between of key cards and full speed game cards which still might be faster than downloads and also helps game preservation by having the game actually on the card. Kind of like CD ROM or floppy disc games on PC.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Because that would be good for the consumer. They make more money on digital only, you don't actually own the product, and you can't resell it.

It's a corporation's wet dream.

The best way to handle it would be to keep the core game files on a physical card that loads into RAM, and download the assets to the local drive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They make more money on digital only, you don't actually own the product, and you can't resell it.

The game-key cards can actually be borrowed or resold, it just doesn't have the game itself on it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Until Nintendo says they can't.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's even worse. All the people who defend the physical editions do it because when servers close, they can still play the game. A game key card is just a glorified digital release. When the servers close, you'll have a piece of plastic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

This is partly the case for any game that receives significant updates as well. Your disc/cart contains 1.0, but is that the version you will want to play 50 years from now when you can't download updates anymore?