this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
211 points (100.0% liked)

Women

922 readers
122 users here now

A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.

For, from, and with women. Hi 👋

RULES:

--Be good to one another.

If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

--About, but not only for, women.

We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.

--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.

No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.

--No selling products or services.

You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a state where 18 is not old enough to drink, Edwards believes girls at 16 are old enough to get married. Edwards’ daughter, Elizabeth, served as a state representative, and Edwards said her service was the inspiration for his run for office. He is in his third term.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

My sister is 16 girl is has enough trouble choosing major. Married is off the table.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“… If we continually restrict the freedom of marriage as a legitimate social option, when we do this to people who are a ripe, fertile age and may have a pregnancy and a baby involved, are we not, in fact, making abortion a much more desirable alternative, when marriage might be the right solution for some freedom-loving couples?”

So I guess this is about wanting teenagers to get baby trapped

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

freedom-loving couples

These fucking people really have a strange definition of the word "freedom". It's like they take any old thing and slap "freedom™ loving" onto it.

And all the other fucking weirdos that don't know what basic words mean go "Ah yes! Freedom! I love freedom! Freedom to lock people up for political opinions. Freedom to dictate to others how they should live their lives. Freedom to force my religion onto others in schools. Freedom to coerce and trap little girls into marriage. And if you don't agree with any of these things, it means you just hate freedom!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Party of pedos gross can we please secede? The west coast wants out of gilliade

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Begging Cascadia to take its shot actually

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago

They all WANT that

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Check his hard drive and phone now

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

OP, why are you posting this now? This is from March 2024, and it's related to ~~the (now dead) bill introduced~~ effort by the New Hampshire GOP to ~~reduce~~ oppose raising the state's marriage age ~~below~~ to 18. Even the post on /c/politics is that old.

Edit: I misremembered this event and wasn't responsible enough to properly verify what I was saying. I'm really sorry.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's scary and gross how the same issue keeps coming back, frequently and in enough places that we can easily confuse one case for another.

Just yesterday I learned about Hardy Billington, a rep in Missouri. The topic article of the thread mentioned him being in favor of child marriage in April 2025, which made it confusing when I checked his Wikipedia page and saw that the only notable thing on it was when he endorced child marriage last year, in 2024. At first I thought it was about the recent bill, but no - this 70+ year old man really wants underage girls to be able to marry.

Point is, you can be forgiven for confusing similar events. The pedophiles are frickin' everywhere. 😟

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for providing needed clarification!!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Please see my edit. I was irresponsible and did a misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Good on ya for owning up to it. Respect

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Thank-you!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Lol even the crosspost is a year old

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

If a 16 year old child is old enough to make long term commitments like raising a child of their own and getting married...

Surely they're old enough for something temporary with no long term effects like hormone blockers, right?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Next time you Commies LAUGH at a Trump Business CLOSING DOWN due to BIDENS Tariffs just REMEMBER that THIS is Why they Voted for Trump! They want to MARRY CHILDREN NOT LOSE THEIR BUSINESS! HAVE SOME COMPASSION DUMB SOCIALISTS!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Vote farming op

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Something something not a drag queen again huh?