Sounds like someone lost $50 to a game of chess
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
The fun police back at it
Literally this. They cannot stand the thought of people having a good time.
Yeah. Because gambling never had any detrimental effects on society.
If you think chess is gambling, you really should get a clue.
Bowling stemmed from a gambling ban. It's gambling if you play a game where you wager money, it doesn't have to be purely or at all luck based (and technically chess has a luck element since white has an advantage).
Though there's a good chance this is just a pretext to stop people engaging in things that might make them too good at thinking for themselves.
You can bet on the outcome but that doesn't make chess itself a game of chance. And you can bet on anything so by that justification you can ban anything.
People will gamble whether it is legal or not much like drugs, alcohol, guns etc. You either drag as much of it into the light as possibke and regulate it or you just hope whatever is in the dark is "okay".
Personally I am more in favor of the regulation than the hope.
Yeah, I'm staunchly for legalization of all "vices" but I'm not going to pretend that they're harmless and aren't valid reasons to want to get rid of them besides being a kill joy.
Maybe it's really because chess is one of the traditional ways to escape oppression. There's more than a few top players that have done so, and speak out about it.
They could just ban gambling instead
Up next: the Taliban authorities indecisive about it's next move, after people start betting on what they'll ban next
Easy! They'll ban people!
The people that voted for "people" get a (small) payout.
Making men who play chess wear hijab might help with this problem.
For people who dont know, this has to do with how people used to play chess during the early Islam days as it had a gambling component. Anything that contain a dice roll is prohibited. Thats why we see the gambling parts in these news. Modern chess is completely different which is not taking into account by Taliban.
In addition to how many hours you spend playing a game as you are not suppose to spend hours on unproductive things.
Also for people who dont know, chess doesnt make you good at critical thinking or enhance your thoughts process. It might have that ability if you mix it as part of other mental activity, but in general playing chess makes you good at chess.
The main issue, how they plan to enforce that rule.
Interesting, I wasn't aware of that connection of chess and early islam, though I was somewhat aware that during the 17-19th centuries, in Europe and USA at least, dice games were seen as "street gambling", but card games were not.
The main issue, how they plan to enforce that rule.
Given it's the Taliban, my bet (heh) is on them sending the wives and daughters of players to jail "as a warning"
I go to Vegas for the chess.
...I'm guessing this is another North Korea haircut story?
My only solace when it comes to this regime is that it's too (edit: in)competent to stay in power for long. Hopefully they collapse sooner than later.
I always put my money on black Rook.
You fool! The en passant odds are through the roof!
Chess gambling ?
Is this like computer chess or chess where the board is in a certain configuration, or two dudes just going at it?
I can't imagine how you'd make a wager. Unless you, yourself are gambling against someone else. Then I guess it doesn't matter, but that isn't really gambling it's just one person paying another to play chess?
…betting on who wins a chess match? A thing that absolutely happens in the betting community?
Honestly, the list of things people don’t bet on is probably shorter.