this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
108 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

1366 readers
6 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to [email protected]

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Credit to @[email protected] for the original meme.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

A distributed surplus value is not an expoitative one.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Which sounds all nice and good but... yeah, that's not how that went down.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Says who? Anyway, the change to capitalism didn‘t improve that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

In case you were thinking the opposite, i think we can safely assume that neither this meme nor the comments support capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Classes like the Party members, the Bureaucracy members, the Military members does not make for a classless society, and neither does the work hierarchy and the use of Taylorism and Fordism.

More importantly to the current times, "surplus" based on cheapened nature such as undervalued waste sinks may not actually be a surplus, but a loss.

the change to capitalism didn‘t improve that.

The change from State Capitalism to Private Capitalism, indeed, did not improve that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Genuinely, isn't this just a "no true communism" argument?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

That doesn't apply every time someone says that a thing is not part of a group. No true Scotsman has never been to Scotland, and no true communist society has a state, classes, or money.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It doesn't make a classless society, but it is necessary at least for a short while to establish the class rule and an actual path towards socialism and withering away of the state.

You can't have socialism without having all of people's needs met which requires repurposing the means of production, you can't have socialism without strong control during the post-revolutionary period given the counter-revolutionary tendencies of bourgeoisie/third-party opportunistic groups (most revolutions happen in pairs/chains, its the most volatile period) - that's the purpose of the period of transition.

Historically, countries such as USSR, China (though its a question if China's revolution was proletarian at all) and later didn't get past the transitionary period because of tens if not hundreds of millions of peasantoids and underdeveloped industry, having them to stay in this awkward period for a long time, which led to complete degeneration of ideology after opportunists took the reigns (like Stalin), who bastardized the meaning of Socialism and essentially caused the countries to become "red bourgeois".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't make a classless society, but it is necessary at least for a short while to establish the class rule and an actual path towards socialism and withering away of the state.

The state, likes its private corporate children, functions as undead zombies. It doesn't wither away peacefully, it grows and attacks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think so long as reigns exist there will always be opportunists ready to take them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Mom, can we have political agency?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I'm pretty well read on capitalism, socialism, communism, and even anarchism, but then a simple comment thread makes me realise I'd need to read 10x more just to follow along.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Nah most theory is theory and not practice. Read the big ones and worry about the details after the Revolution, they'll have to adopt to needs first anyways.

Pretending otherwise is where you get into trouble.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta love Hexbear magically finding their way in here...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46417185

And here's hexbear whining about this point. Claiming they didn't brigade but are whining about it when found out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago