this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
375 points (100.0% liked)

memes

16067 readers
3160 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
375
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Rich White People: "Humans are simply incapable of self-governance. They are too violent, too prone to conflict, too hell bent on self-obliteration. I suppose we are doomed as a species to exterminate ourselves and all other life surrounding us."

Every Other Socio-Economic Group: "STAHP! PLEASE STAHP!!!!"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Those aren't mutually exclusive, though. Even if 99.9% of a species fits in perfectly with the environment, if that last little sliver destroys everything, and the rest of the species is unable and/or unwilling to stop them, then we destroy everything anyway. Sure, it may not be ALL humans, but it's still humans.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Greed and lack of vision aren't flaws exclusive to white people. Implying such is racist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's literally not what they said, or implied. I hope you're just bad at reading and social comprehension, someone else may take up explaining it to you.

Unless you're a bot or a paid actor. (Or did the writer edit their comment to add "rich" after you posted? That might be implied by the couple of comments below.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They quite literally painted the picture as rich white people vs everyone else, including rich not-white people (see: Every other Socio-Economic group).

Getting real tired of people with bad reading comprehension talking shit about reading comprehension.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

What a stupid take.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Remember kids, racism is okay if MY Group does it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Please see: street kids playing the game and hustling for money. It's the same exact strategy as businessmen. The same game. It's all the same from the bottom to the top, and these shitty rappers have people sucking their dick about struggle when they are doing the same manipulative things as the rich people.

Kill yourself, or go to war against it before you ever play that game.

Selling meth, crack and H, or pimping and trafficking is just as shitty as being a crooked cop making side money or a corrupt politician or businessman. Where were they when there were protests against cops? In 2020 they proved they are bitch and down for nothing but money. Not only that but when you understand how all that shit works, you know regular people use them, they are basically used by feds to do the dirty work the feds can't legally do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Typical Lemmy comment.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The basic cycle of mass extinction is that an organism becomes too successful and breaks the ecosystem in ways that more complex life has trouble surviving.

So, yeah, an intelligent species has to prove itself capable of self control to not destroy its own environment or at least capable enough to spread before it does.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, and our energy consumption is probably the biggest test of that self-control. We're burning through millions of years of stored sunlight in a couple centuries. If we don't figure out sustainable power generation soon, we're toast. I've been researching backup power options at gearscouts.com and the $/Wh efficiency of LFP batteries is getting way better, but we need grid-scale solutions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's only about energy storage and will. We've had clean, safe nuclear designs for over half a century, it is purely greed that has deluded even many of those that claim to defend the environment that keeps us on the path to self annihilation.

Reminder that Chernobyl was doomed from the outset because it was made to serve two masters: power AND weapons grade enrichment.

Technology hasn't been the bottleneck, greed has. I will never forget or forgive my species for priorities like these: Made solely to keep us addicted to the worst forms of power generation.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Dont worry, there will be others. We're just one of the first precursor species.

Not a particularly interesting one, but still.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I just hope that when another sentient species evolves they will learn from our ruins.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I think it makes more sense to say that money is the great filter that's threatening us right now. It's the root of all evil, after all.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Love of money is the root of all evil.

In reality, it's more like unfettered greed of certain people

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would say that psychologically it’s the addiction of power. We toe the line where “competition” creates the dopamine release of “being better than others.”

Yet for some that means it’s never enough. Richest person in the world? Need to take over government. Most powerful world leader? Need to assert myself even more.

I think the great filter often boils down to unnecessary competition. In the short term it leads to technological strides, but in the long term it becomes a species self-harm, and perhaps broader. A good theoretical example is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remembrance_of_Earth's_Past

Tap for spoilerEvery species that exists within that series is so focused on ensuring they have the most power that they will go out of their way to annihilate any other species due to the assumption that’s what all of them will do is seek more power. Ironically considering the scientific and technological capabilities of the involved parties, they may have been able to work together towards a better outcome than “anyone who isn’t me is my enemy” which is basically universal fascism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been floating the idea that evolution is the ultimate culprit. Add intelligence to "most prolific, genetically" and get capitalism, then late stage capitalism in our technological age, and viola...

I've been told I'm insane, though, so take it with a grain of salt

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Well, that ending might lead one to believe there's maybe a smidge of insanity.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Power not money. Government, patriarchy, racism, and their ilk all drive people in similarly destructive ways, money is just the (highly visible) common language.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Money is just paper. Now it's just bits on a disk.

The human need to acquire I think is the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you don't think money is power, and your don't think information is power either. What is?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

They are saying it is more general than money or information, that those are power but those specifically are not special. If we had a society without money, something else would occupy the same purpose of the psychological need of humans "to get more" to be on top.

They aren't saying "money isn't important to that", they are saying "money isn't important to that".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's actually type b personally disorders. Without them, capitalism couldn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mental health professional here. Can confirm. But they need a lot of enablers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the other half of the filter. Regular people follow them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, not really.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Nah.

We might end up back at cave dwellers with cancers that kills us at 30, but we'll maintain a local presence.

A filter doesn't prevent life on earth continuing, it just stops it contaminating outter space.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

But the point of Fermi's Paradox is that we are not seeing evidence of alien intelligence anywhere. We don't expect it here on earth, but we look out in space and see no light/radio/other waves that look like messages; no energy bursts or other anomalies that don't have better explainations (though some have no explaination at all). The Great Filter is simply a hypothesis -- like the Dark Forest -- as to why we don't see evidence of intelligent life in space.

If we went back to caves, we'd have great-filtered ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cancer never killed people young in relevant quantities, that is a big reason why we never evolved to get rid of it to begin with: We already have old kids by the time it causes trouble. The same way getting another set of teeth never evolved. Or generally getting far older.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think he meant the environment will be so polluted and radioactive that cancer will be more common at younger ages

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Mother nature made us more clever than other animals but didn't give us any additional wisdom. So we destroy our environment and overshoot our population the same as any other species.

Too bad our environment is 'everywhere.' Perhaps nature wanted to commit suicide and so spawned us.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

nature will be fine. when you really think about it the planet is just beget by the stars so like are we really that important? probably just one of a thousand attempts across the universe.

[–] FistingEnthusiast 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hold with the idea that we haven't encountered an alien intelligence because species reach a point where they destroy themselves

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Or, if they get past the great filter of self-absorbed shittery, they either:

  1. Realize how dangerous and pathetic almost smart enough species are and steer clear entirely.
  2. Realize life itself is a game of greed and shittery and settle in to a life of reclusive observance to not be greedy.
  3. Allow themselves to die off because life is a pathetic attempt to be special on a stage that is far too vast to ever change or give a damn about sentience.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I lean towards 1.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The traits that allow a species to achieve global dominance are not compatible with long term survival.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sure they are. When tempered with other obvious evolutionary advantages like foresight and valuing the needs of the community above ludicrous individual hoarding.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I once saw someone exclude AI apocalypse from list of existential risks on the grounds that the AI lives on even if we don't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AI jumps out of its server farm to go refill the generator tanks?

I'm not sure about that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

robots and drones and stuff exist. If the AI is capable of exterminating humans I'm sure it can figure out robotics.