this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
139 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

17850 readers
1903 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of people who are bad at business.

A $40 paper flower, and a $2000/mo lease. Assuming you are sole proprietor and have zero employees, and need an additional $2000/mo to live a meagre existence (food, apartment, etc.) and it takes you 15 minutes to fold each flower.

Minimum revenue to stay afloat, 800 flowers per month. You'd need to fold for 200 hours, or approximately a 40 hour week of folding. That leaves zero time to do any marketing. So you're relying entirely on foot traffic, or you're marketing as overtime.

To reach 800 sales per month with something so trivial, you'd property require a reach of at least 20,000 customer touch points per month, each who has the time to chat about paper flowers, because your conversion rate is going to be shit. If it's passive reach, you might need to get an ad in front of half a million per month. You'd need to be a tiktok celeb or something to get this reach without adding expensive ads. And that's a fucking gamble and a half.

There's no way this model works. And the fact that someone tried it isn't something to celebrate. They possibly poured their life savings into the drain, went bankrupt, and hopefully concluded they were bad at business.

If you want to sell paper flowers, do it as a side gig from you home. Or make them so luxurious that you can sell them at $1000 each, and rich people buy them as wedding presents -- then you only need to sell four per month and can spend the rest of the time marketing.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus this isn’t a comic strip, this a 4 panel graphic novel

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's like an essay in dialogue form, pasted over clip art. It doesn't really work, but I admire the effort and hope the artist keeps at it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

David Malki has been doing it for 22 years, I reckon he knows his limits!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ITT people that have never read Wondermark before.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is the most readable font I've ever seen in a comic!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

phones r bad

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Was this written by AI? It doesn't follow logically. The first panel is a man wanting to buy origami flowers. The third panel is the woman admonishing the man as if he were the origami owner.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "you" in the 3rd panel refers to the hypothetical shop owner referenced in the 2nd panel, not the dude she's talking with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is a confusing way to frame a sentence though, saying "you" in the context of an acted out conversation with someone who isn't there

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

It's a valid and moderately common construction. This is called the generic (or indefinite) form of you. It's primarily used as a colloquial or less formal substitute for one.

But yes, you do have to infer whom you is referencing from the context, so I could see why some might find it more confusing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not only that, but the art is strangely copy pasted between panels, and has no consistent style between elements. I suspect each bit was independently found (or AI generated), and then the creator used Photoshop or the like to compose it together.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Dude's been making this webcomic for over two decades. Try reading it again more slowly if y'all don't get it the first time.