this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
497 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

26122 readers
374 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
    497
    Dirty Talk (lemmynsfw.com)
    submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
     

    Disclaimer: Do not run this command.

    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 152 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    Obligatory DO NOT RUN THIS ON YOUR COMPUTER (or anyone else's).

    You'd think with fully open permissions, everything would work better, but many programs, including important low level things, interpret it as a sign of system damage and will refuse to operate instead.

    If you do run it, you'd better have a backup or something like Timeshift to bail you out, and even if you do have that, it's not worth trying it just to see what will happen.

    It's not quite as bad as deleting everything because you can boot from external media and back up non-system files after the fact, but the system will almost certainly not work properly and need to be repaired.

    You have been warned.

    [–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    New guy at work ran this to try to fix permissions on his home folder, accidentally ran it on root (both would have been bad)

    Several highly paid and experienced Linux admins finally just gave up and deleted the server and built a new one from the backups.

    [–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Which, honestly, is the better way to go. Treat your compute resources like cattle, not pets.

    [–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

    One of our servers is a rotting carcass being kept alive by our collective prayers. It runs Windows 7 and custom software whose developer is dead and the source is missing, nothing has been updated for over a decade, and it has its own independent UPS because once it goes down, it has an extremely slim chance of recovering, and we're afraid to test it. It controls the card entry system into the building, including the server room. Boss doesn't want to replace it because we'd have to replace all of the terminals and controllers too, and it hasn't catastrophically failed yet.

    You're right. It's not a pet. It's like one of the Saw movies: if it dies, we're all fucked.

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    So... the dead server controls who is even able to enter the building? Wow. That is one big juggernaut of a problem heading for you.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

    Typically a brick can control who can enter the building. Security man the doors for a few days until the new system is in.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

    The question I often ask clients who think this way is "How much would it cost if it did fail? Let's say this happened today. What would be the cost to replace it NOW and not only that but make sure people who are working can still do so with the interruption?

    Now how much would it cost to schedule the interruption and manage the fall out in a way that is controllable?

    For some, the catastrophic failure points to "hey I fixed the thing!" And the incentives for that kind of person are different from the person whose job is to mitigate risk.

    It sounds like your boss is the former. In which case it's going to be fun when it fails.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I gΓΆnne be honest, it sounds kinda stupid to be reliant on a server to open the door to the same server.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I learned this relatively quickly running my own server with the intention of my family also using it. Data on a separate drive, backed up regularly and automatically. System on it's own drive, dd'd when it's in it's final state and backed up before I screw around any deeper than trying out a new container. I can bring my server back up in however long it takes to transfer data.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

    Why does he have rights to use sudo in the first place?

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I will make a disclaimer. Thanks.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Someone actually ran it on a server at my workplace, trying to fix file permissions on a samba share. Broke SSH and the samba daemon. Thankfully I was able to fix by removing the permissions from the config files the error logs pointed to.

    Just saying, I think it was a ChatGPT idea, other people use it every day. I only use it if I'm completely stumped, and only take it as suggestions.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    One time I introduced someone to Linux then left them to their own devices.

    I returned to them hours later to find out they had gotten annoyed with permissions errors and run chown -R ${THEIRUSER}: /.

    The results were not what they wanted.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

    But how else will I make everything work without issues

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    asexuals and demisexuals be like sudo chmod -R 700 /

    [–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    Doms with cuck and denial fetishes have partners like

    sudo chmod -R 077 /
    
    [–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago

    Jesus Christ

    [–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    What do the funny words mean? (i understand neither 700 & 077)

    [–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
    • sudo is telling the computer to do this with root privileges.
    • chmod sets permissions.
    • Each digit of that three-digit number corresponds to the owner, the group, and other users, respectively. It's 0–7, where 0 means no access and 7 means access to read, write, and execute. So 077 is the exact inverse of 700, where 077 means "the owner cannot access their own files, but everyone else can read, write, and execute them". Corresponding 700 to asexuals is joking that nobody but the owner can even so much as touch the files.
    • / is the root directory, i.e. the very top of the filesystem.
    • The -R flag says to do this recursively downward; in this case, that's starting from /.

    So here, we're modifying every single file on the entire system to be readable, writable, and executable by everyone but their owner. And yes, this is supposed to be extremely stupid.

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    This is the best comment I’ve come across in a while. Thank you so much for breaking it down so well.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

    Just wait until you need to figure out what you want when you want something other than all or none for those permissions. 4 is read, 2 is write, 1 is execute. Add them up to get what you want for each owner/group/other portion.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

    Thank you a lot.
    The funny words have a useful meaning :D

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    7 is read, write, and execute permissions. 700 is owner, but not group or others. 077 means the owner has no permissions, but group and others all have full permissions.

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Thank you for the explaination ^^

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    File permissions...

    allowed to execute=1, allowed to write=2, allowed to read=4

    grouped by owner/group/everyone.

    So one of your own files you have full access to while users in your usergroup are only allowed to read it and nobody else has any permissions would have: 740 (read+write+execute / read / none).

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
    sudo chown -R nobody:nobody /
    
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    You and @[email protected] really out did yourselves

    [–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    If I wanted Windows perms I would have installed Windows

    [–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Windows perms are pretty locked down though. Sometimes I can't delete my own files because I need permission from "Administrator" :/

    You can actually use Windows-style permissions (ACLs) on Linux via setfacl.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    If only...

    Those are POSIX acls, and they suck

    We could have had NFSv4 ACL, of which windows ACLs are a subset. In fact, every other unix os did... Except for Linux, they decided it didn't fit well to Linux. And so we are stuck with UGO permissions, and posix ACLs.

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

    Good catch - I should have said that it's closer to Windows-style ACLs rather than implying that it's actually the same.

    [–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Most Linux filesystems, being case sensitive, won't find the SUDO command.

    [–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    With alias all things are possible.

    alias SUDO='sudo rm -fr / --no-preserve-root'
    
    [–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

    If you shout at your shell, it refuses to listen

    [–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

    CHMOD command does not exist either. It's just the meme's font that is in all caps.

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

    Glad I'm not the only one that thinks like this.

    [–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    I did chmod -R 666 / when I started playing with Linux in 1999. It did not end well.

    Sudo didn't really exist back then, you ran things as root like real men. /s

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Taking the term open sourced to a whole new level!

    Everybody has permissions!

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    It's still not really open-source until you open up all the ports now don't you think?

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

    definitely nsfw

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Sorry, that's a huge turn off. Filesystem perms exist for a reason and should be respected

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

    Yeah, this is modern day slutshaming

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

    Dear god. We’re exposed.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

    all your base are belong to us

    [–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

    Back in my early days of Linux I ran this exact command, I forget why, but for some reason my WiFi stopped working immediately after and then SELinux started yelling at me for some reason. I tried to fix SELinux and most certainly commited an innumerable amount of cardinal sins.

    I had to reinstall whatever distro I was running at the time

    [–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Does anyone else pronounce it "schmod"?

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I pronounce it spelling out only C H, but spelling them in my native language, so it sounds like "chee akka mod" and of course the same goes for "chee akka own"

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

    Nope. Sorry lol.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

    Made me puke in my mouth

    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί