520
She cares more about her career than about all the people that will die as a result of her vote. Edit: Just like all the others who voted for this btw.
Not all of them, plenty of them voted for it because of the people it will harm as a result.
Have you seen the fucks cheering after it passed? Imagine knowing you're fucking over 15+ million people just so you can get a tax break. Disgusting as fuck.
Did you see them laughing while voting down the Democrats’ amendments? Straight up sociopathic.
I’d like to say that Alaska will vote her out but Alaska isn’t known for being progressive or sane. People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps in peace.
Murkowski was literally primaried by a further right nut job, ran in the general as a write in, won and rejoined the Republicans. The only thing that will stop Alaskans electing her is death or retirement.
Well she hasn't had an election since RCV started, so hopefully we get a better Senator
We're at the point that I'm not sure if this is an onion.
*nibble nibble*
Edit several hours later: oh shit this is not an onion. FML.
As a former resident of Alaska I say that, yes that is true.
People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps
Not to mention the enormous, life-changing $1700 per year of oil money everybody gets.
It's usually not that much though. But yeah it is quite the boon every october
Her defiant reaction to the backlash was the worst part of it. She refuses to acknowledge people's ire. She ends up making the case that she did it for Alaskans at the expense of the rest of her country. That she knew it was wrong but didn't mind throwing everyone else under the bus.
Alaska got an exemption from Medicaid Cuts. I imagine her rationale was that she was protecting her constituents. Fucked everyone else though.
All she had to do was say 'no,' and she could have protected her constituents and 330,000,000 other Americans.
The "I got mine. Fuck you" mindset is pretty on brand for Republicans
Yeah but her constituents still have to deal with all the other shit in the bill too so it's not like she really did them any favors.
I guarantee she has a nice cushy lobbyist position lined up for Big Oil after pushing that bill through. She could give two shits about reelection with that fallback.
did you see her dead eyed rage directed at a reporter who dared ask her why she did it https://youtu.be/0uQMNRpjQ-A
(Go to 4:28.)
She’s a piece of shit.
These people shouldn't be elected, they should be studied. In a lab.
Fuck that cunt!
I don't want all this responsibility, I just wanted respect and a nice house. Why are these problems mine to deal with?!
This is the problem with having old people decide on things. Anybody who has a grandmother or grandfather knows how many mistakes they make in a single day.
Remember when republicans would harp on Grover Norquists Taxpayer protection pledge about swearing theyd never raise any taxes? Yeah way back in the old before times, like 2024. You never hear about that anymore.
Does anyone have a non biased article about what the bill actually does? Everything I’ve seen does not present any downsides to the bill, even going as far as to say it will be good for Americans.
I know for a fact there limitations on the tax on tips and OT
None Bias link: https://www.congress.gov/index.php/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1
My biased take if you were looking for downsides: There's a lot of downsides. ICE massive funding increase to rival the budget of a military in other countries, slashes to programs for impoverished children and their families, adding several trillion dollars to the deficit through uncontrolled spending. That's just a fraction of this bill. Even some of the more hardcore republicans were having trouble taking a bite of this big beautiful shit sandwich. This may have ended several political careers which we will see during the mid terms. The dumbass in the original post is one of them which is why she's pivoting for sympathy as an independent.
Buddy I am a moron I can’t understand politician jargon. You sent me a link to the actual bill. I was just hoping to find an article that breaks it down with both the pros and cons. I’ve tried the major news sources but read 0 drawbacks. Every liberal source just says it’s terrible for Americans. They don’t even explain anything about it other than it cuts SNAP and Medicaid.
Those are drawbacks
I wouldn't expect you to read 1000 pages. But you can pick highlights from news sources, do a control F on the highlighted point in the bill and see if what they are saying is true or just bias. Not being a smart ass, but making your own opinions without someone telling you what to think or feel is paramount to be being informed.
Then everything you've seen is biased. Have you tried Ground News? It will tell you the biases of sources.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
520 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24898 readers
2696 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS