this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
198 points (100.0% liked)

News

30736 readers
2938 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 hours ago

Killing civilians is the best way to ensure that Hamas will have a steady supply of volunteers

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Trump and the Israelis wont stop the war. Why would they? Trumps "peace" is a farce and a delaying tactic.

[–] [email protected] 112 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

"If you want to destroy bigotry, you have to kill the bigots." How does that sound, Alan?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 hours ago

Sounds better than what he said, you're not advocating for killing bystanders.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're literally no better than Hamas at this point. Hamas's who deal is, "fuck it. We'll kill the innocent with the guilty, let Allah sort it out."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Please give me: statistics on the bystanders killed by hamas vs. statistics on the bystanders killed by the Israeli occupation forces

EDIT: Misread comment, but hamas still clearly values human life more than Israel

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It's actually a lot worse. The IDF has a much, much higher rate of civilians killed for every noncombatant than Hamas does. Hamas is objectively better at avoiding civilian casualties than the IDF is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Oh my bad, I misread your comment and thought you meant they're better than hamas.

I'm palestinian so I am biased, and I do obviously agree 100%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Would be interesting to see the statistics, if someone has calculated them. I wonder if reservists count as combatants or noncombatants. Would skew the numbers a lot

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the vast vast majority of Hamas fighters are what a regular military would classify as "reservists." Hamas are mostly part-time fighters who otherwise have regular civilian jobs and live regular civilian lives. (Or at least they did before the Gaza strip was blown to rubble.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Hamas is an irregular force, not sure they have what are traditionally understood as reservists

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 hours ago

I came here to up-vote this comment. Thank you for posting it.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. IDF headquarters is in downtown Tel Aviv. Every accusation is projection. We really need to stop listening to this sex pest.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 53 minutes ago

he can be more than one thing, hes versatile

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Palestine has the right to defend itself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Israel doesn't

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

So what exactly is the difference between this and terrorism? (Nothing)

Wikipedia: Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In particular, fear, or "terror". You can use violence without anyone knowing, and you can create fear without violence. The fear is the key factor.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

That refines the definition but does not show a difference. There are reports of starving gazans too scared to show up to food distribution.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't the attempt at that exactly how you get more hamas?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

He'd probably respond, "Not if you kill them all." Which of course has its own defined word that he'd deny.

Next step is when they publicly say that they're doing genocide, but only on "those" people. (let me guess, someone already did that maybe)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Has anyone suggested tattoos and gas chambers or we not going with full irony quite yet?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

Ya no way some other group from somewhere else will pop up

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 hours ago

Insurgencency operation math: 10 insurgents before - 2 killed insurgents = now you have 20 insurgents

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Which is exactly the point. They need Hamas just like George Dubya needed "terrorists" so they keep manufacturing them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

@RandAlThor

There is a special seat in hell for Alan 'Diddy' Dershowitz, if hell exists

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Is that your final solution, Al?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 hours ago

"Can I phone a fascist?"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That's the only viable strategy - if there was some number of Palestinian civilians that Hamas could operate among with impunity, it would do. I don't think Israel is currently fulfilling its obligation to protect civilians as much as is practically possible while still fighting a war effectively, but civilian casualties would be high even if it was simply due to the nature of urban warfare against an enemy operating among civilians who have nowhere to evacuate.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The fuck are you talking about.

Israel is actively aiming for and shooting unarmed civilians standing in line to get food for their starving families.

Fuck Israel fuck the IDF, and anyone who supports them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I agree that the notion that Hamas can be defeated by denying it food, and furthermore that doing so justifies starving the civilian population, is indeed something I consider well outside the boundary of civilized warfare. The fact that Israel is doing that makes it hard to believe that it is seriously attempting to minimize civilian casualties in other ways. With that said, my point is that Dershowitz is still in principle correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

And what do you personally think of this strategy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Strategy? Genocidal much?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He's correct, but that doesn't justify it. Just the opposite.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

"If you want to destroy Israel you have to kill the civilians"

Is exactly the same logic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

That would destroy Israel, but that doesn't make it the right thing to do

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

What are you trying to say here?